Destrona" in English means "he/she/it dethrones" or "he/she/it deposes" (from the verb destronar). It is used to describe removing someone from a position of power, such as a monarch, leader, or champion (e.g., in sports or rankings).

Destrona" in English means "he/she/it dethrones" or "he/she/it deposes" (from the verb destronar). It is used to describe removing someone from a position of power, such as a monarch, leader, or champion (e.g., in sports or rankings).

Destrona" in English means "he/she/it dethrones" or "he/she/it deposes" (from the verb destronar). It is used to describe removing someone from a position of power, such as a monarch, leader, or champion (e.g., in sports or rankings).

by GravelWincher123 February 20, 2026

Power Paradigms

The theory that whoever holds power determines not just policies but paradigms—the very frameworks through which reality is understood. Power Paradigms argues that truth, logic, science, and reality itself are shaped by those who control institutions, resources, and discourse. The powerful don't just dominate the world; they dominate the terms by which the world is understood. Paradigms shift not when evidence accumulates but when power shifts—when new groups gain the ability to define what counts as knowledge, what counts as reasonable, what counts as real. Power Paradigms explains why history is written by the victors, why certain knowledge is marginalized, why some truths are unspeakable. It's the theory that reality has a ruling class.

Example: "He used to think science was pure, objective, above politics. Then he learned about Power Paradigms—how funding shapes research, how institutions control publication, how those with power determine what counts as knowledge. Science wasn't corrupted; it was always political. The question wasn't whether power influenced knowledge, but whose power, and toward what ends."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Reality of Power

The theory that reality itself is shaped by power—that what counts as real, what counts as true, what counts as possible is determined by those who hold power. The Theory of the Reality of Power argues that power doesn't just control resources or institutions; it controls the very terms of reality. Those who have power define what can be said, what can be thought, what can be known. They determine which facts matter, which truths are recognized, which realities are real. This is not conspiracy; it's structure. Power shapes reality not by lying but by defining the terms on which truth is told. The Theory of the Reality of Power is the recognition that reality has a politics.

Example: "He used to think reality was just reality—given, fixed, neutral. The Theory of the Reality of Power showed him otherwise: those with power decided what counted as real. Their version was taught in schools, repeated in media, enforced by law. Other realities existed, but they were marginalized, suppressed, erased. Reality wasn't neutral; it was political. He started asking who got to define what's real—and who paid the price."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Power of Reality

The theory that reality itself is shaped by power—that what counts as real, what counts as true, what counts as possible is determined by those who hold power. The Theory of the Power of Reality argues that power doesn't just control resources or institutions; it controls the very terms of existence. The powerful define what can be said, what can be thought, what can be known. They shape reality not by lying but by defining the frameworks within which truth is told. This theory is the foundation of critical realism, of the recognition that reality has a politics, that truth is never neutral.

Theory of the Power of Reality Example: "He used to think reality was just reality—given, fixed, neutral. The Theory of the Power of Reality showed him otherwise: those with power decided what was real. Their version was taught, repeated, enforced. Other realities existed, but they were suppressed. He started asking who got to define reality—and who paid the price."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Efficiency of Power

The theory that power determines what counts as efficient—that those with power define efficiency in ways that serve their interests, and that these definitions then shape reality. The Theory of the Efficiency of Power argues that efficiency is not discovered but decreed: the powerful decide what measures matter, what outcomes count, what costs are relevant. Their efficiency becomes the efficiency, their standards become the standards. The theory is the recognition that efficiency has a politics, that power shapes not just who benefits from efficiency but what efficiency means. It's the foundation of critical efficiency studies, of the insistence on asking "efficient for whom?" before accepting any efficiency claim.

Example: "The powerful called the policy 'efficient.' The powerless called it destruction. The Theory of the Efficiency of Power explained why the powerful's definition prevailed: they had power to define the terms. Their efficiency was the only one that counted, because they counted it. He stopped asking 'is it efficient?' and started asking 'who has power to define efficiency?' The answer explained everything."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026