Skip to main content

Social Sciences of Logic

The study of how logical systems and reasoning practices are embedded in social contexts and shaped by social forces. While logic presents itself as pure, timeless, and culture-free, the social sciences of logic ask: Who gets taught formal logic? Which logical systems dominate in which societies? How do power dynamics affect what counts as a "valid" argument? It's not denying that logic works, but examining why certain logical forms become privileged while others are marginalized.
Example: "The social sciences of logic reveal that Aristotelian logic dominated Western thought not because it's the only possible logic, but because the social institutions that preserved and taught it had the power to do so."
Social Sciences of Logic mug front
Get the Social Sciences of Logic mug.
See more merch

Social Sciences of Scientific Orthodoxy

The application of social science disciplines—sociology, anthropology, political science, economics—to the study of scientific orthodoxy. The social sciences of scientific orthodoxy examine how social forces shape consensus: how power, status, and networks influence who gets to define orthodoxy; how economic interests (funding, patents, consulting) shape which views become dominant; how political contexts influence what counts as acceptable science; how cultural values are embedded in orthodox assumptions; how institutions create and maintain orthodox views through training, hiring, and promotion. They treat scientific orthodoxy not as a purely intellectual phenomenon but as a social one—shaped by all the forces that shape any human community. The social sciences of scientific orthodoxy reveal that consensus is never just about evidence; it's always also about power, money, culture, and social structure.
Example: "His social sciences of scientific orthodoxy research showed how the Cold War shaped which research programs became orthodox in several fields—not because scientists were political, but because funding followed political priorities, and what gets funded becomes what gets studied, and what gets studied becomes what's known."

Social Sciences of the Scientific Method

The application of social science disciplines—sociology, anthropology, political science, economics—to the study of the scientific method. The social sciences of the scientific method examine how social forces shape methodological practice: how power and status influence which methods are valued; how economic incentives shape methodological choices; how political contexts constrain or enable certain kinds of inquiry; how cultural assumptions are embedded in methodological standards; how institutions create and maintain methodological orthodoxies. They treat the scientific method not as a purely logical procedure but as a social practice—shaped by all the forces that shape any human activity. The social sciences of the scientific method reveal that method is never just about logic; it's always also about power, money, culture, and social structure.
Social Sciences of the Scientific Method Example: "His social sciences of the scientific method research showed how the dominance of quantitative methods in economics reflects not their inherent superiority but the political and economic interests that funded certain kinds of research over others. The method that won wasn't necessarily the best—it was the best supported."

Social Sciences of the Laws of Physics

The application of social science disciplines—sociology, anthropology, political science, economics—to the study of how physical laws are discovered, validated, and understood within social contexts. The social sciences of physical laws examine how social forces shape law-discovery: how scientific communities form around law-seeking programs; how status and authority influence which law-claims are accepted; how funding priorities direct attention to some laws rather than others; how cultural assumptions are embedded in our conception of what laws are; how political contexts constrain or enable certain kinds of law-research. They reveal that even the most fundamental physical laws are discovered and validated through social processes—that the community of physicists is a social system with all the dynamics that entails. The social sciences of physical laws don't claim that laws are social constructions (they describe reality), but that our knowledge of them is socially produced.
Social Sciences of the Laws of Physics Example: "His social sciences of physical laws research showed how the search for a theory of everything became a dominant research program not because it was the most promising, but because it captured institutional imagination, funding priorities, and career incentives. The science was real, but the direction was social."

Social Sciences Applied to Social Media

A field of study that uses sociological, anthropological, political, and economic frameworks to analyze how social media platforms shape human behavior, community formation, power dynamics, and cultural production. It examines phenomena like algorithmic governance, influencer economies, digital labor, online identity formation, and the transformation of public discourse. By applying social science tools—ethnography, network analysis, surveys, critical theory—to social media, it moves beyond superficial engagement metrics to understand how platforms mediate social life, reproduce inequality, and create new forms of belonging and exclusion.
Social Sciences Applied to Social Media Example: “Her research applied sociology to TikTok, showing how the algorithm’s preference for controversy pushed creators toward increasingly extreme content—a social science lens revealing the structural drivers of online polarization.”

Social Sciences Applied to the Internet

A broader field extending social science methods to the entire internet ecosystem—infrastructure, governance, political economy, and culture. It examines how internet architecture (protocols, data centers, fiber optics) embodies political values, how governance regimes (ICANN, national regulations) shape freedom, and how economic models (surveillance capitalism, gig platforms) reorganize labor and value. It treats the internet not as a neutral network but as a contested social space where power, resistance, and inequality are enacted.
Example: “His work on social sciences applied to the internet traced how the shift from net neutrality to privatized data flows concentrated economic power in a handful of platform companies, reshaping global digital rights.”

Social Sciences of Atheism

A multidisciplinary umbrella covering sociology, anthropology, political science, and economics applied to atheism. It studies atheist movements, secularization trends, the political representation of non‑believers, the economic determinants of religious decline, and comparative international attitudes toward atheism. The social sciences of atheism treat atheism as a social fact to be explained, not a philosophical position to be debated.
Example: “Social sciences of atheism research showed that secularization correlated with social safety nets—not because people lost faith, but because existential security reduced the demand for religious consolation.”