Theory of Dual Reality

The theory that there are two simultaneous realities: a visible, public, surface reality, and an invisible, hidden, deeper reality—like software and hardware, or like the non-secret world and the secret world that actually runs things. Dual Reality argues that what we see, what we're told, what's official is only part of the story; underneath runs another reality, hidden from most, known to few, that actually determines how things work. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's structural analysis. Every system has its visible face and its hidden machinery; every institution has its public story and its private truth. The Theory of Dual Reality explains why things are often not what they seem, why those in power seem to know things others don't, why reality feels layered. The visible reality is for most people; the invisible reality is for those who need to know.

Theory of Dual Reality Example: "He'd always sensed there was more going on than he could see—decisions made elsewhere, information withheld, a hidden hand. The Theory of Dual Reality gave him language for it: visible reality was what he was shown; invisible reality was what actually ran things. He started paying attention to the gaps, the silences, the things that didn't fit. The hidden reality never fully revealed itself, but he learned to read its traces."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Perspectivist Theory

The systematic elaboration of perspectivism as a framework for understanding knowledge, truth, and reality. Perspectivist Theory argues that all cognition is perspectival—that there is no unconditioned access to reality, no pure observation, no view from nowhere. It develops the implications of this insight across domains: epistemology (knowledge is always from a perspective), ethics (values are always from a standpoint), aesthetics (beauty is always from a viewer). Perspectivist Theory doesn't collapse into relativism because it recognizes that perspectives can be more or less adequate, more or less comprehensive, more or less useful. It's the theory that we see through lenses, and that the task is not to remove the lenses but to understand them.

Example: "He'd been searching for the one true theory, the final framework, the ultimate perspective. Perspectivist Theory showed him that was a fool's errand. There was no ultimate perspective—only different ones, each adequate to different purposes. He stopped searching for the view from nowhere and started mapping the views from somewhere. It was a relief."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Contextualist Theory

The systematic elaboration of contextualism as a framework for understanding knowledge, truth, and meaning. Contextualist Theory argues that all cognitive claims are context-bound—that the conditions under which a claim is made, the purposes for which it's made, the audience to which it's addressed all shape what the claim means and whether it's true. It develops the implications of this insight across domains: epistemology (knowledge attributions vary with context), semantics (meaning varies with context), ethics (moral judgments vary with context). Contextualist Theory doesn't collapse into relativism because it recognizes that contexts are structured, that some contexts are more appropriate than others, that context-sensitivity is not arbitrariness.

Example: "He'd been frustrated by arguments that seemed to go nowhere. Contextualist Theory showed him why: each person was speaking from a different context, assuming their context was universal. The arguments weren't about truth; they were about which context should prevail. He stopped trying to prove his context right and started explaining where he was standing."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Valid Post-Truth

The systematic elaboration of valid post-truth as a framework for understanding contemporary epistemology. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth argues that we are witnessing not the death of truth but its mutation—a shift from truth-as-correspondence to truth-as-performance, truth-as-identity, truth-as-weapon. It traces the conditions that produced this shift: the collapse of trusted institutions, the rise of social media, the weaponization of information, the fragmentation of publics. It doesn't celebrate this shift or lament it; it seeks to understand it, to map its contours, to navigate its terrain. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth is the attempt to think clearly about a world where truth is no longer what it was.

Example: "He'd been searching for a way to understand the new information landscape—the lies that felt true, the facts that convinced no one. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth gave him language: truth had mutated, shifted from correspondence to performance. He stopped trying to fight the old war and started learning to navigate the new terrain."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Post-Western Rationality

The systematic elaboration of post-Western rationality as a framework for understanding cognitive diversity. The Theory of Post-Western Rationality argues that the dominance of Western rationality is a historical accident, not a logical necessity—a product of colonialism, not cognitive superiority. It traces the development of alternative rationalities in different cultures, shows how they work on their own terms, and argues for their legitimacy. It doesn't claim that all rationalities are equally good for all purposes; it claims that they are different tools for different tasks, and that we need all of them. The Theory of Post-Western Rationality is the foundation of cognitive decolonization, of the recognition that reason has many homes.

Example: "He'd assumed that Western science was simply the best way to know things. The Theory of Post-Western Rationality showed him otherwise: Indigenous knowledge systems, Eastern philosophies, African epistemologies—all were rationalities, all were valid, all had things to teach. He stopped treating other ways of knowing as inferior and started learning from them."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Reality of Power

The theory that reality itself is shaped by power—that what counts as real, what counts as true, what counts as possible is determined by those who hold power. The Theory of the Reality of Power argues that power doesn't just control resources or institutions; it controls the very terms of reality. Those who have power define what can be said, what can be thought, what can be known. They determine which facts matter, which truths are recognized, which realities are real. This is not conspiracy; it's structure. Power shapes reality not by lying but by defining the terms on which truth is told. The Theory of the Reality of Power is the recognition that reality has a politics.

Example: "He used to think reality was just reality—given, fixed, neutral. The Theory of the Reality of Power showed him otherwise: those with power decided what counted as real. Their version was taught in schools, repeated in media, enforced by law. Other realities existed, but they were marginalized, suppressed, erased. Reality wasn't neutral; it was political. He started asking who got to define what's real—and who paid the price."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Valid Postmodernism

The systematic elaboration of valid postmodernism as a framework for critical engagement with contemporary reality. The Theory of Valid Postmodernism argues that postmodern insights are not a descent into relativism but an ascent into complexity. It traces the development of postmodern thought, shows how its critiques can be used constructively, and develops criteria for distinguishing between useful deconstruction and destructive nihilism. It doesn't claim that all truths are equal; it claims that truth is more complicated than we thought. The Theory of Valid Postmodernism is the attempt to think clearly in a world where old certainties have collapsed and new ones haven't yet been built—and maybe shouldn't be.

Example: "He'd been searching for a way to hold postmodern insights without falling into despair. The Theory of Valid Postmodernism gave him that: critique without cynicism, deconstruction without destruction, complexity without collapse. He could see how truth was constructed without giving up on truth. He could question everything without believing nothing. Valid postmodernism was the middle path he'd been looking for."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026