Sunk cost fallacy is a dead song of popular EDM artist Fox Stevenson that the community kept dear to their hearts.
No, Sunk Cost Fallacy is a dead song and is neve- WAIT WHAT!?!??!? SCF BEFORE GTA VI WHAT THE SHI-!?!
by samostalniivan123 May 27, 2025
Fault-to-Ratio Fallacy
A phrase created by John R. Williams III in early 2024.
The fault-to-ratio fallacy refers to the mistaken reasoning where someone dismisses an individual’s entire set of beliefs or arguments simply because they hold one or a few demonstrably false or flawed views. This fallacy ignores the "ratio" of truths to faults, assuming that one error invalidates all other ideas or arguments, even if some of them are inherently correct or well-founded.
A phrase created by John R. Williams III in early 2024.
The fault-to-ratio fallacy refers to the mistaken reasoning where someone dismisses an individual’s entire set of beliefs or arguments simply because they hold one or a few demonstrably false or flawed views. This fallacy ignores the "ratio" of truths to faults, assuming that one error invalidates all other ideas or arguments, even if some of them are inherently correct or well-founded.
Example:
Person A: "I believe the Earth is flat, but I also believe that 2+2=4."
Person B: "Since you believe the Earth is flat, everything you say must be wrong."
Here, Person B commits the fault-to-ratio fallacy by rejecting Person A’s correct belief (2+2=4) because of their incorrect belief about the shape of the Earth. Instead of evaluating each idea on its own merit, they discredit all ideas based on one fault
Person A: "I believe the Earth is flat, but I also believe that 2+2=4."
Person B: "Since you believe the Earth is flat, everything you say must be wrong."
Here, Person B commits the fault-to-ratio fallacy by rejecting Person A’s correct belief (2+2=4) because of their incorrect belief about the shape of the Earth. Instead of evaluating each idea on its own merit, they discredit all ideas based on one fault
by TheMightyRaccoon December 27, 2024
A fallacy people often engage in when attempting to debate someone of superior intellect. It is the presupposition that sakkorafas has the capacity of holding a non ideal position
Eg. Sakkorafa diafwnw
The person questioning the validity of sakkorafas' claim has failed to comprehend that sakkorafas making a mistake cannot be characterized as something that belongs in the realm of possibilities due to foxness
Eg. Sakkorafa diafwnw
The person questioning the validity of sakkorafas' claim has failed to comprehend that sakkorafas making a mistake cannot be characterized as something that belongs in the realm of possibilities due to foxness
Oh man nathan's fallacy meter started going off after a globetard attempted to debate mr sakkorafas, the sheer ignorance of globies these days is fascinating they are just constantly sakkorafas fallacying
by Zuck Markerberg March 02, 2020
You assert a Claim So stupid that you make your opponent dead therefore its under the retardation fallacy and your opponent automatically winz
by Big eggd December 05, 2024
Person 1: I have studied Flat Earth For 6 Years and Know without a shadow of a doubt Earth is Flat
Person 2: Can you Prove that with any repeatable, tests, experiments, or Observations?
Person 1: I have one picture someone else took but you should just trust me bro because I've been researching for 6 years and don't have any real evidence.
Person 2: That's A Nathan Fallacy
Person 2: Can you Prove that with any repeatable, tests, experiments, or Observations?
Person 1: I have one picture someone else took but you should just trust me bro because I've been researching for 6 years and don't have any real evidence.
Person 2: That's A Nathan Fallacy
by Just show Proof March 31, 2024
When you don't understand real science and data so you just create wor salads to try and confuse people
Person 1: Well, we can prove earth is a ball because stars Circle around a southern celestial pole.
Person 2: Nuh, uh.
Thats a nathan fallacy
Person 2: Nuh, uh.
Thats a nathan fallacy
by Just show Proof April 19, 2024
The willing ignorance of an individual behind a piece of work that was created with the assistance of AI for the purposes of focusing solely on the AI itself or dismissing the work's creator.
I could have just used "Created by AI" in the above sentence, but that in of itself is an example of The Monika Fallacy, as AI is incapable of creating anything without some kind of human input.
by Barbara Kirkland8702 December 25, 2023