Law of the Possible Fallacies

The principle that for any argument, it is possible to interpret it as fallacious—there is always some way to apply a fallacy label, regardless of the argument's actual merit. The law acknowledges that fallacy-mongering is infinite: given enough creativity, you can find an ad hominem, a straw man, a slippery slope in any discourse. This possibility doesn't mean all arguments are fallacious; it means fallacy labeling is not objective. It's a rhetorical move, not a logical judgment. The law of the possible fallacies warns against the weaponization of fallacy terminology—just because you can call something a fallacy doesn't mean it is one.

Example: "He could find a fallacy in any argument, no matter how sound. Straw man? You're oversimplifying. Ad hominem? You're attacking the person. Slippery slope? You're predicting disaster. The law of the possible fallacies explained: it's always possible to see a fallacy if you want to. The question was whether the fallacy was real or just his imagination."

by Dumu The Void February 17, 2026

Law of the Fallacy Possibility

The principle that fallacies represent possibilities, not certainties—they identify ways reasoning could go wrong, not guarantees that it has. Calling an argument a slippery slope doesn't prove it's wrong; it identifies a possibility of error that must be evaluated. Calling an argument ad hominem doesn't settle the matter; it raises a possibility that must be assessed. The law of the fallacy possibility reminds us that fallacy labels are hypotheses, not verdicts. They open inquiry rather than closing it. The real work is not in naming the fallacy but in determining whether it actually occurred—whether the possibility is actual.

Example: "She said his argument was a slippery slope. He agreed it was possible, then asked for evidence that the slope would actually slide. The law of the fallacy possibility said: naming the possibility doesn't prove it's real. The debate shifted from labeling to evidence, which is where it should have been all along."

by Dumu The Void February 17, 2026

Theory of Possible Contradiction

The metaphysical and logical framework proposing that two contradictory statements can both be true—not in the same sense, at the same time, from the same perspective, but across different dimensions, contexts, or frames of reference. The theory acknowledges that reality is complex enough to encompass apparent opposites: love and hate can coexist, success and failure can be simultaneous, order and chaos can be two faces of the same process. The Theory of Possible Contradiction doesn't reject logic; it expands it, recognizing that binary truth-values are insufficient for a world where most important truths are multidimensional. This theory is the foundation of dialectical thinking, of mystical paradox, of any worldview that embraces complexity rather than reducing it.

Example: "She loved her job and hated it—loved the work, hated the politics; loved the mission, hated the hours. The Theory of Possible Contradiction said: both true, in different dimensions. She wasn't confused; she was honest. Contradiction wasn't a problem to solve; it was a reality to accept."

by Dumu The Void February 18, 2026

Principle of Possible Contradiction

The logical principle that contradictions are possible—that two opposing statements can both be true in different respects, from different perspectives, or at different levels of analysis. This principle challenges the classical law of non-contradiction (which says something cannot both be and not be in the same sense) by noting that "in the same sense" is doing crucial work. Different senses allow different truths. The Principle of Possible Contradiction is essential for understanding complex systems, where A can cause B and B can cause A, where order emerges from chaos, where love includes hate. It's the principle that lets us hold multiple perspectives without mental collapse, that allows wisdom to embrace paradox rather than flee from it.

Example: "He was both confident and terrified before his presentation—confident in his preparation, terrified of the audience. The Principle of Possible Contradiction said: both real, both true, both him. He didn't need to resolve the contradiction; he needed to perform with it. He did, and both feelings proved justified."

by Dumu The Void February 18, 2026

Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability

A framework for evaluating the plausibility and probability of phenomena that seem supernatural, paranormal, or otherwise beyond ordinary explanation—such as spiritual experiences with gods (dreams, visions, visitations), levitation when no one is watching, or other anomalous events. The law proposes that such phenomena should not be dismissed outright but evaluated along multiple dimensions: internal consistency (does the account make sense on its own terms?), external coherence (does it align with known facts?), source reliability (is the witness credible?), and explanatory power (does it explain what needs explaining?). The law also acknowledges that probability is not static—what seems impossible today may become plausible tomorrow as understanding expands. The Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability doesn't prove such phenomena real; it provides a framework for taking them seriously without requiring belief.

Example: "She'd had vivid dreams of a goddess for years—not hallucinations but experiences, real to her, transformative. Skeptics dismissed them as imagination. The Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability offered another view: internally consistent, externally coherent with her life, source reliable (her own experience), explanatory (it explained her peace). Not proof, but plausibility. She didn't need belief; she needed the space to consider that some things might be real even if unproven."

by Dumu The Void February 19, 2026