by Benjamin K, lead scientist November 10, 2020
A caveat to the odds game which enables the user to withdraw from odds which have previously been given to them with no forefeit.
Orginally concieved when Grant Saint Clair lost his odds and was required to chin a pan of rum. Unable to face this he feebly asked for an amendment to be added which would allow him to be exempt from these odds.
The amendment was carried over to other members of the group with two rules only:
1. The amendment can only be used on a holiday/trip - it does not apply to every day situations.
2. Each individual within the group is entitled to only one use of their amendement.
Orginally concieved when Grant Saint Clair lost his odds and was required to chin a pan of rum. Unable to face this he feebly asked for an amendment to be added which would allow him to be exempt from these odds.
The amendment was carried over to other members of the group with two rules only:
1. The amendment can only be used on a holiday/trip - it does not apply to every day situations.
2. Each individual within the group is entitled to only one use of their amendement.
Creation story:
John: "Grant, odds you down that pan of rum?"
Grant: "I cannot do this, I'm smashed."
John: "Fucking pussy, 5/1 max"
Grant: "3/1 ya prick"
John: "Count us in"
Steve: "3, 2, 1...."
Grant & John: "2"
All except Grant: "eyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy"
Grant: "I physically cannot do this. Pulling out my amendment, this is not happening tonight"
And so, Grant's Amendment was born.
John: "Grant, odds you down that pan of rum?"
Grant: "I cannot do this, I'm smashed."
John: "Fucking pussy, 5/1 max"
Grant: "3/1 ya prick"
John: "Count us in"
Steve: "3, 2, 1...."
Grant & John: "2"
All except Grant: "eyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy"
Grant: "I physically cannot do this. Pulling out my amendment, this is not happening tonight"
And so, Grant's Amendment was born.
by Bol'ead March 04, 2018
Section 1. Any individual who uses the text symbol “:3” in written communication shall be deemed cute.
Section 2. For the purposes of this Amendment, “:3” is defined as a text symbol depicting a smiling face with a playful or affectionate expression, often used in digital communication to convey feelings of warmth, joy, or endearment.
Section 3. This Amendment shall be implemented in the spirit of kindness and positive expression, recognizing that the use of “:3” signifies an attempt to spread happiness and good cheer in communication.
Section 4. No laws, regulations, or interpretations shall contradict or undermine the spirit of this Amendment, which is to promote a culture of friendliness and appreciation among individuals.
Section 2. For the purposes of this Amendment, “:3” is defined as a text symbol depicting a smiling face with a playful or affectionate expression, often used in digital communication to convey feelings of warmth, joy, or endearment.
Section 3. This Amendment shall be implemented in the spirit of kindness and positive expression, recognizing that the use of “:3” signifies an attempt to spread happiness and good cheer in communication.
Section 4. No laws, regulations, or interpretations shall contradict or undermine the spirit of this Amendment, which is to promote a culture of friendliness and appreciation among individuals.
by NateVRC July 19, 2024
Well, it look like your pal there is complicit in the theft of intellectual property related to the current AI model. My contribution, no matter how small it SEEMS, brought AI into the mainstream and is the difference between it working the way it does now and is, therefore, cardinal to it's function. The problem of perception. The idea that you would need a massive data set and the allusion to a scaling disparity between the AI and the human brain (specifically the conversion rate between sensory data and the hippocampus). And the compression algorithm to cut down on the energy cost. All of these, posted with the intent to be published and copyrighted at the point of insemination but diverted to a place to which I have no access for the purpose of profiting off of my unpaid labor and from my property.
Hym "Your job is to uphold the constitution. And as per the 5th amendment of the constitution, a government employee is complicit (knowingly or otherwise) in taking my property without providing me due compensation. And that's just my 5th amendment grievance. There's also the violation of my privacy that continues to happen to this day. I'm clearly being surveilled in some capacity. Therefore, I am hereby invoking the privacy act of 1974 which requires government agencies to show an individual any records kept on him or her as it is clear to me my name and location are being disclosed without my written consent. The person diverting this very post (to where it goes after I hit send) is also culpable in the disclosure of OTHER PEOPLE'S NAMES, without THEIR written consent. As I do not intend for this to be diverted away from me, this is something for which I am not responsible. If said surveillance is in any way punitive, I have yet to be charged with a crime and have, therefore, had my 4th amendment rights violated. Whatever perceived threat I pose is (at this point) entirely theoretical and cannot be considered justification for surveillance as I have been denied my right to habeas coprus as per the 4th amendment. That. Do that. That is your job. And the job of your colleagues. You should all be doing this and have had 9 years to do it."
by Hym Iam February 04, 2025
Refers to where you resignedly accept someone else's weirdo-type interest, opinion, assertion, etc., knowing dat it's a necessary "normalcy wrinkle" dat "comes wif da turf" in da allowance of free speech which we all are entitled to, even it means occasionally rolling our eyes at a particular individual's off-da-wall appearance, practices, or beliefs.
Tomboy girl, beamingly showing off a huge bullfrog she's just caught: Look at his cute face and big googly eyes --- isn't he just GORGEOUS???
You (smiling tolerantly and giving a First-Amendment shrug): Well, I never really thought about it, honey, but if you're into frogs, then I suppose he's absolutely DAZZLING...!
You (smiling tolerantly and giving a First-Amendment shrug): Well, I never really thought about it, honey, but if you're into frogs, then I suppose he's absolutely DAZZLING...!
by QuacksO November 12, 2023
Hey, remember how I made a 14th amendment argument for my thing? Roe vs Wade is predicated on the 14th amendment! What happened to your 'rights' shit-head? My thing was happening before yoiur thing wasn't it? And youuuuu... What? Didn't give a shit. That's what. You didn't give a shit. Remember? 'You wouldn't care if it was me' Remember when I said that? Situations like this are what that statement applies to. You get it. So I guess... Shit em out or keep em closed then, huh? You sure showed me.
Hym "Yeah, the 14th amendment is dope. If only people gave a shit about it as much as I do! But they don't. Which is why Roe vs Wade gone! The shit-libs only care when it's them and the zealots think that there are more important things than 'rights.' Like, for example, doing what their incest God wants. So... Yeah, told you so. When you undermine the thing upon which your rights are predicated you kind of undermine your rights and make it easy for charlatans and zealots to take them away. And now neither of us have them. And why? Because you're like the gazorpazorp female dictatorship. 'Ok. Fine. I was going to crush you with a boulder. I just didn't want to admit you were right!' So... You know... There you go! Enjoy that. You're going to lose the next election too and they're using my rhetoric to galvanize their base so... Remember who you lost to... It's me. I'm better. You are worse. Enjoy equality. We're equal now! Hurray equality! I didn't have 14th amendment right and now you don't either! Wooooooo equality!!!"
by Hym Iam July 06, 2024
Oh no! The 14th amendment!? OH NO! We care so much about that (now and not 7 years ago when I was saying exactly that! Remember? Remember when I was saying this was a violation of that exact thing? And now they're doing it to you and now it's a national emergency? Remember?)
Hym "Hey, do you REMEMBER that? When I was saying that thing? About how why this was wrong? But ONLY NOW THAT IT AFFECT A FUCKING WHORE does anyome give a shit about it. The WHORE who's running around getting raw dogged by every fat cock she meets behind he boyfriends back... NOW THAT IT AFFECTS HER and that the gallom od semen she's pouring into herself my have a tangible consequence... NOW THE 14TH AMENDMENT MATTERS! ONLY NOW does it matter. Because 'ThEy'Re gOiNg To UsE iT tO tAkE mY dEcIsIoN-cOnSeQuEnCe pRiViLeGeS aWaY!' Fucking trash! You're absolute garbo!"
by Hym Iam March 04, 2024