Metasocial Social Sciences

The recursive discipline of applying social scientific methods to the community of social scientists themselves. It's the study of the academic tribes, their rituals (conferences), their status symbols (citations, tenure), and their origin myths (the "founding fathers"). It examines why certain theories become fashionable and others are forgotten, why some departments are feuding and others are allied, and why the phrase "paradigm shift" is used so often it has lost all meaning. It's sociology for sociologists, and it requires a high tolerance for inside jokes.

Example: "A metasocial social sciences study observed that papers with longer titles and more complex jargon were cited more frequently, regardless of their actual content. This confirmed what every grad student suspected: in academia, sounding smart is often more important than being smart."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Metacognitive Sciences

The formal study of thinking about thinking, which inevitably leads to thinking about thinking about thinking, creating an infinite regress that usually ends with you staring blankly at a wall, having forgotten what you were originally thinking about. It's the academic discipline that tries to understand why you can't remember why you walked into the kitchen, why you argue with yourself in the shower, and why your brain decides 3 AM is the perfect time to review every embarrassing moment since 2003. The primary research tool is the "wait, what was I saying?" moment.

Example: "I was deep into metacognitive sciences, analyzing why I always procrastinate. I realized it was because I was afraid of failure. Then I started thinking about why I was afraid of failure, and then why I was thinking about why I was afraid of failure. Two hours later, I had done no work and had achieved a state of pure, unproductive self-awareness."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Metacognitive Social Sciences

The study of how groups of people collectively think about their own thinking, and how that shared metacognition shapes their culture, communication, and conflicts. It examines phenomena like "groupthink about groupthink," where a committee spends hours discussing how to avoid wasting time in meetings. It analyzes why certain communities develop elaborate jargon to describe their own internal thought processes (e.g., tech bros "circling back" on "mental bandwidth"), and how entire societies can collectively obsess over their own collective obsession (e.g., "the discourse about the discourse").

Example: "The company retreat was a masterclass in metacognitive social sciences. The entire team spent three hours discussing how they could have better discussions. They then scheduled another meeting to discuss the discussion about discussions. No actual work was done, but everyone felt very self-aware."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Metalogical Sciences

The academic discipline that studies the systems of logic we use to study everything else, essentially asking "is our reasoning about reasoning reasonable?" It's the field that discovered that any logical system, if powerful enough to describe arithmetic, is either inconsistent or contains statements it can't prove (thanks, Gödel). In practical terms, metalogical sciences explain why every attempt to create a perfectly logical argument on the internet eventually devolves into someone saying "well, that's just your logic, man." It's the science of proving that logic has limits, which is logically frustrating.

Example: "He tried to use metalogical sciences to win an argument with his girlfriend. He explained that her emotional response was logically inconsistent with the premises she'd established. She replied that his reliance on formal logic was a classic example of the limitations of propositional calculus in capturing human experience. He had no response, because she was metalogically correct."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Metalogical Social Sciences

The study of how groups of people develop, adopt, and enforce shared systems of logic and reasoning. It examines why certain cultures value deductive reasoning over inductive, why academic departments feud over methodological approaches (qualitative vs. quantitative), and why some online communities have completely different standards for what counts as a "valid argument." It's the field that asks: if logic is universal, why do two reasonable people looking at the same facts so often reach completely different, yet internally logical, conclusions? The answer, usually, is tribalism.

Example: "A study in metalogical social sciences compared Reddit and Twitter argumentation styles. It found that Reddit favored lengthy, source-cited deductive arguments, while Twitter favored pithy, emotionally resonant assertions. Both communities considered the other's logic to be fundamentally broken, confirming that logic is often just whatever your in-group agrees upon."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Epistemological Social Sciences

The study of how groups of people collectively acquire, validate, and transmit knowledge, examining everything from scientific communities to conspiracy theory forums. It asks why some knowledge spreads and other knowledge dies, how communities establish trust in sources, and why your aunt believes Facebook posts more than peer-reviewed studies. Epistemological social sciences reveal that knowledge is not just a collection of facts but a social process, shaped by trust, identity, and whether the information confirms what the group already wants to believe.

Example: "An epistemological social sciences study compared how scientists and flat-Earthers validate claims. Scientists used peer review, replication, and evidence. Flat-Earthers used YouTube comments, feelings, and the conviction that everyone else is lying. Both groups considered themselves epistemologically rigorous. Only one group had satellites."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026

Epistemological Sciences

The formal study of knowledge itself—what it is, how we get it, and whether we can trust it. Epistemological sciences ask the big questions: Can we really know anything? Is your memory reliable? Is that fact you read on the internet actually true? The field has generated millennia of debate and has conclusively proven that certainty is elusive, except for the certainty that certainty is elusive, which is either a paradox or a punchline. Most people avoid epistemological sciences because they prefer to just believe things and move on with their day.

Example: "After taking a course in epistemological sciences, he could no longer read the news without questioning the reliability of the sources, the biases of the reporters, and the fundamental nature of truth itself. He now gets his information exclusively from memes, which he acknowledges are epistemologically worthless but at least admit they're joking."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026