Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
We exist in The Hopversion
by Someguyyeet January 04, 2024
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
The point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
The point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
by Someguyyeet April 25, 2024