1 definition by PedroPierre
1. Someone who considers ancient texts to be on the same level of credibility as scientific research.
2. Someone who is fully aware of the abundance of evidence refuting the claims of religion, but couldn't care less about religious ideology ruining the world.
2. Someone who is fully aware of the abundance of evidence refuting the claims of religion, but couldn't care less about religious ideology ruining the world.
Agnostic: "CAN YOU PROVE THAT!? PROVE IT!! YOU CAN'T PROVE THAT !!!! LET'S SEE YOU TRY AND PROVE IT!!"
Atheist: "Stop crying. Not believing in something because of a lack of evidence is rational. Believing in something without evidence is irrational. Saying both sides of the argument are equal is both smug and stupid."
Atheist: "Stop crying. Not believing in something because of a lack of evidence is rational. Believing in something without evidence is irrational. Saying both sides of the argument are equal is both smug and stupid."
by PedroPierre December 17, 2010