look up any word, like cunt:
the cutting off of the foreskin.
A primitive and barbaric operation.
I have seen studies that say that there is no health benefit at all to it.
But if there is some. I have a proposal. That the breast buds of all baby girls be excised so that they don't develope breast.
Thousands of lives and millions of dollars in medical expenses could be saved because it would wipe out breast cancer.
Also that all female babies be circucised so that it will cut down on there sexual activity which would cut down on teen pregnancies, STDs and HIV.
millions of lives and millions od dollars could be saved.
shall we do that or do we have a double standard.
circumcision is wrong.
by Deep Blue 2012 August 10, 2009
An entirely legitimate procedure done with a male child, usually at birth, that involves cutting off the excess foreskin of the penis. Those who have not been circumcised are required to pull back the foreskin over the head and clean it, if this is not done early in life (which is entirely possible due to that the United States only accomodates for circumcised men, that they never show pictures of uncircumcised penises when a child is studying Sex Ed so the uncircumcised boy doesn't know what it's supposed to look like) then the ligements in the penis will bond to the foreskin and the skin will have to be medically pulled back by anesthesizing the head and scrotum with an epidermic needle, which is equally painful, if not moreso, then having the foreskin completely cut off at birth.

The foreskin has one rewarding factor in that it increases sexual pleasure, but most uncircumcised men will never be able to experience that due to the bizarre and gross appearance of the penis (seriously, it looks like a saarlac) that will disgust the woman.
“Ah!” Sammie yelped “You think my vagina’s gross! What the hell’s the matter with your penis!?”
Jack looked down at it “I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it, society!”
“Society made your penis look like a sarlac?”
“No” he pulled his foreskin over the head “It used to look like this.”
“What happened?”
“I already told you, society!”
“That still doesn’t answer my question!”
“Okay, my parents didn’t have me circumcised when I was born.”
“Why would they ever do such a thing to a young child?”
“I know, right!? Now I have to suffer for life, as opposed to the few short seconds that I would have as a child.”
“So why don’t you just get it taken care of?”
“Because it hurts.”
“So? Isn’t it better than having a penis that looks like it eats Jedi’s?”
“I suppose so, but foreskin actually increases the amount of pleasure” he shrugged his shoulders “I don’t know. I just sure as hell know that our kids are getting it cut off.”
“Damn right they are! I want the best for our children.”
“Me too, they’ll even fit in better. It’s the most important thing you can do for a child.”

*Lil' Jack Horny: Circumcision Discussion*
by Jackyl Hermanubis October 19, 2009
A barbaric deevolving caveman act, with roots to virgin sacrifices.
Circumcision is so utterly foolish, that even how they circumcisioned, was retarted. It would be much less senseless, to remove skin at the base of the penis, permanently retracting the foreskin, then carefully reconnecting the veins arteries nerves etc., but knowing that much is better to just leave it all there.
#10, on the bottom of page 1 here, has a circumcision joke about short sighted got the sack, but that is not a joke: http://www.circumstitions.com /Restric/Botched4ga.html
Connect the space to work the link, again note the bottom of the page.
Doctors aren't helping there but to pass down an initiation and a revenge of sorts, so they are homophobic and lazy about really considering it, much like when they call STD's merely cists or zits, instead of treating it like a cancer and taking it out.
Lord's higher science requires a light shined from the heart, to help us see over the devil's dimmer deceptions. If the devil tried to say that circ. prevents masturbation or STD's, then consider the Lord's true truth may be opposite. How does circumcision beget masturbation? A pattern of oppression where the young man hasn't the right to keep his anatomy complete and to himself, then by the time he is horny he is still no where near having the right to marry in a manner which is due or timely, if not married he will masturbate. This covers the other issue as well, if not allowed to marry among other relative evolutionary advancement in time, they will fornicate in filthy irresponsible patterns, which will contract them STD's.
Then devil conspires: But young brides are too small to have their vaginas ripped open by a baby just yet, and young men do not want to marry yet (they want to be players and pimps).
Then Lord may assign a wise human for them to reply: That is why I have created to evolve you with the wisdom given your current human population at present, to consider the most unmutating and safe forms of birth control possible. Also, they are of a lower paradigm that needs to be ascended and shifted, it is easy for them to cop an excuse that they do not want to do what they don't even know they should have the right to do.
by Informant August 03, 2006
The act of surgically removing the foreskin from a man's penis. The surgery is usually done to boys as infants. Reasons range from religious (practiced in the Jewish and Muslim faiths) to personal (many fathers want their sons to be like them; some parents worry about their sons not being like other boys) to health (birth defects or physical problems that could be fixed or relieved with the removal of the foreskin). The act is most common in Jewish and Muslim countries, as well as the United States (though the rate is decreasing). Most boys in Europe, Asia and Central and South America are not circumcised.

Although it has been a controversial subject for many years, most doctors now agree that the surgery is not beneficial except in individual, health-related cases. Most insurance companies no longer cover the surgery. A penis generally functions the same way circumcised or not, so the only real difference is aesthetic.
John was not circumcised because his parents didn't feel there was good reason to do so.

Daniel and Elizabeth's son was circumcised as a part of their Jewish faith.
by david January 22, 2005
Ooooooooooowwww! (from the Latin for "oooooooowwww!")
Circumcision? "Uhh...could you talk about something else? Like prison rape? Anything?" -Jim Gaffigan
by aaargh i am not a pirate April 05, 2011
An operation often done to boys at birth (or at least before puberty). Not necessary for health (as long as the guy is clean) or sexual pleasure, and no great aesthetic improvement. De rigeur among some communities, usually for religious reasons.

Probably something that a grown man should decide to have done to himself, as opposed to something that a little boy's parents decide to have done to him.
"What are your views on circumcision?"
"I have none...but I won't do it to any son of mine."
by Qit February 27, 2004
Something that should never ever be attempted whilst drunk
my friend was sliced up quite badly by a botched circumcision. Then his girlfriend left him
by Jinzaki May 31, 2005