Theory of Logical Transparency

A logical and meta‑logical principle that the rules and premises of an argument should be made fully explicit, so that any step can be examined and challenged. It rejects the use of hidden assumptions, ambiguous terms, or unstated inferences. Logical transparency is essential for critical thinking, formal systems, and honest debate—it forces reasoners to show their logical work, not just their conclusions.

Theory of Logical Transparency Example: “He demanded logical transparency in the debate: every premise had to be stated, every inference justified. When his opponent relied on ‘common sense’ without definition, the transparency principle exposed the gap.”

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 24, 2026