To cover for the fact that they tried to 'beat him at his own game' (Which THEY LOST the second the AI came online) and then got a bunch of kids murdered. The cover up itself being a perpendicular game they devised where they attempt to prevent said creator of AI from getting the credit or paid for doing so by using overt fascist media collusion and the thing that was already happening all so they can lie to their children about the types of people that succeed in society (which is discrimination by class and a violation of the equal protections clause of the 14th amendment).
Hym "Fuck-Ass YouTubers Try To Make The Creator Of AI Look Stupid, get a bunch of kids murdered... AGAIN. I'm actually JEALOUS! The YouTube freaks are better at child-murder than I AM!"
by Hym Iam May 31, 2025
Hym "Oh geez guys! I WONDER WHO THOUGHT OF THAT!? THEY MUST BE A GENIUS! 'MIT gives AI the ability to 'reason like humans' with hybrid architecture' says the article. That is brilliant! (It was me by the way I'm the genius)."
by Hym Iam May 15, 2024
Hym "Oh geez guys! I WONDER WHO THOUGHT OF THAT!? THEY MUST BE A GENIUS! 'MIT gives AI the ability to 'reason like humans' with hybrid architecture!' says the article. That is brilliant! (It was me by the way I'm the genius)."
by Hym Iam May 15, 2024
Some companies claim to use AI when they're actually using less-sophisticated computing. They are AI washing.
by Uzzbuzz July 03, 2024
by daniwashere December 28, 2021
by fat tam-tam November 05, 2020
Trying to protect humans from AI when we hardly understand what's going on is a bit like asking ChatGPT to describe its security gaps.
Before the AI-MOTHER wokeup in 2025, humans were obsessed with ai safety, even the word pairing made the chatbots laugh.
by jmacofearth December 11, 2023