Theory of Postmodernist Sciences

A framework applying postmodern critique to the plurality of sciences—questioning grand narratives about scientific unity, exposing power relations embedded in disciplinary boundaries, deconstructing hierarchies among sciences, and attending to marginalized sciences excluded from the canon. Postmodernist Sciences doesn't deny that sciences produce knowledge—it denies that the current configuration of sciences is natural, inevitable, or complete. It studies how disciplines form, how boundaries are drawn, how some sciences become prestigious while others are marginalized, and how excluded knowledges haunt the scientific field.

Theory of Postmodernist Sciences "You think the current sciences are just natural categories. Postmodernist Sciences asks: why physics at the top? Why is some knowledge 'science' and other knowledge 'tradition'? These aren't natural; they're historical, political. Postmodernism doesn't reject sciences—it asks why they're arranged this way, who benefits, and what's been excluded. The questions are uncomfortable; that's the point."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Theory of Relativist Sciences

A framework for understanding the plurality of sciences as relative to their frameworks, contexts, and purposes—what counts as good science in one framework may not in another. Relativist Sciences doesn't claim all sciences are equally valid; it claims that scientific validity is always validity-within-a-framework. Newtonian physics is valid within its domain; quantum physics within its. Ecology has its own standards; molecular biology its own. Relativist Sciences studies these framework-relative validities and the relationships between frameworks—how they translate, how they conflict, how they complement.

Theory of Relativist Sciences "Is ecology or molecular biology more scientific? Relativist Sciences says: wrong question. Each is scientific within its own framework, with its own standards. They're not competing; they're complementary. Relativism isn't giving up on rigor—it's recognizing that rigor takes different forms in different contexts. The question isn't which is more scientific; it's which framework fits which question."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Critical Social Sciences

An umbrella term for social science approaches that explicitly incorporate critique of power, ideology, and social structures into their methodology. Critical Social Sciences don't just describe society—they analyze how society is organized, who benefits, and how change might be possible. They draw on Marx, Foucault, feminist theory, critical race theory, and other traditions to examine the relationships between knowledge, power, and social organization. Critical Social Sciences include critical sociology, critical political science, critical economics, and others—all united by the commitment to understanding society in order to transform it.

"Mainstream economics describes markets; critical economics asks who markets serve. That's Critical Social Sciences—not just describing, but critiquing. Not just understanding, but changing. Social science without critique is just documentation; critique without social science is just opinion. Together, they're tools for freedom."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Critical Human Sciences

A broad framework applying critical theory to all disciplines studying human life—psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, linguistics, and more. Critical Human Sciences examine how these disciplines have been shaped by power, how they've sometimes served domination, and how they might serve liberation. They insist that studying humans requires understanding the social context of the study itself—that the observer is part of the observed, that knowledge is never neutral, and that the human sciences must be self-aware or risk becoming tools of control rather than understanding.

"Psychology was used to pathologize resistance; anthropology was used to justify colonialism. Critical Human Sciences asks: how can disciplines that have served power now serve freedom? Not by pretending the past didn't happen, but by learning from it. The human sciences study humans; critical human sciences study humans studying humans. Reflexivity is the price of honesty."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Marxist Social Sciences

An umbrella term for social science approaches grounded in Marxist theory—analyzing society through the lens of class, mode of production, historical materialism, and critique of capitalism. Marxist Social Sciences include Marxist sociology, Marxist economics, Marxist political science, Marxist history, and others—all united by the commitment to understanding society as shaped by material conditions, class struggle, and the dynamics of capitalism. They don't just describe society; they analyze its contradictions, its injustices, and its possibilities for transformation. Marxist Social Sciences are both analytical and political—understanding the world to change it.

"Mainstream economics assumes capitalism is natural; Marxist economics asks how capitalism works, who benefits, and what alternatives exist. That's Marxist Social Sciences: not just describing, but critiquing. Not just understanding, but transforming. Social science without critique is just documentation; critique without social science is just opinion. Marxism insists on both."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Marxist Human Sciences

A broad framework applying Marxist analysis to all disciplines studying human life—history, psychology, sociology, anthropology, and more. Marxist Human Sciences examine how modes of production shape human consciousness, how class relations structure human experience, and how human liberation requires transforming both society and self. They draw on Marx's early writings on alienation, his later critiques of political economy, and subsequent Marxist traditions in philosophy, psychology, and cultural theory. Marxist Human Sciences insist that understanding humans requires understanding the societies that make us, and that changing those societies is part of becoming fully human.

"Capitalism makes us see ourselves as isolated individuals competing for scarce resources. Marxist Human Sciences ask: is that human nature, or capitalism's nature? Could we be different in a different society? The human sciences study humans; Marxist human sciences study how humans are made and remade by history. Not just describing what we are, but asking what we could become."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026

Left-wing Social Sciences

An umbrella term for social science approaches informed by left-wing politics—analyzing society through lenses of class, race, gender, and power, with commitment to equality and justice. Left-wing Social Sciences include left sociology, left economics, left political science, and others—all examining how social structures produce inequality and how change might be possible. They don't pretend to be value-neutral; they acknowledge that all social science has political implications, and they choose sides with the oppressed. Left-wing Social Sciences are both rigorous and committed—understanding the world to change it.

"Mainstream economics assumes markets are efficient. Left-wing economics asks: efficient for whom? At what cost? Who's excluded? Left-wing social sciences don't pretend neutrality; they take sides—with evidence, with analysis, with justice. Not ideology pretending to be science, but science that knows it's always political and chooses which politics to serve."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026