The inherent corruption that occurs when the institution of science is conflated with the scientific method. This is the transformation of science from a process of open, fallible inquiry into a political entity—a state-sanctioned authority that gets to definitively regulate what is considered "objective" and, by extension, "moral." The problem arises when the label "scientific" is wielded not as a descriptor of methodology, but as a cudgel of power to silence dissent, marginalize non-hegemonic worldviews (by labeling them "pseudoscience"), and enforce a single, materialist ontology as the only valid reality. In this politicized state, defending science devolves into a fundamentalist posture of declaring everything else "non-science," creating an empty, negative identity more concerned with gatekeeping authority than with understanding the world. It's when the priesthood in lab coats cares more about protecting the temple's power than pursuing messy, unpredictable truth.
Example: "When the public health agency's messaging shifted from 'here is the evolving data on masks' to 'any questioning of our mandates is anti-science pseudoscience,' they showcased the Political Problem of Science. The method—tentative, evidence-based—was replaced by the institution's need for unquestioned authority, turning a public health tool into a political loyalty test."
by AbzuInExile January 31, 2026
Get the Political Problem of Science mug.The flip side of the same coin: the use of the accusation of "pseudoscience" as a primary political weapon to dismiss and demonize ideas, not because they have been engaged with substantively, but because they challenge a dominant ideology or power structure. This problem exposes how the term is often emptied of its epistemological meaning (critiquing structural contradictions) and is instead deployed as a cheap, thought-terminating smear. By reducing all critique to the category of "not-science," the accuser avoids the harder work of defending their own ideological assumptions, using the cultural authority of science as a shield. Ironically, this reductionist discourse—which bases its entire identity on a negative definition—becomes its own form of pseudoscience, mimicking science's authority while abandoning its spirit of open scrutiny.
Example: "Dismissing all critiques of industrial agriculture as 'organic pseudoscience' without addressing the specific points about soil depletion and pesticide runoff is the Political Problem of Pseudoscience. The agribusiness lobby isn't defending scientific rigor; it's using the label to pathologize any challenge to its economic model, turning a valid debate about systems into a hollow war of epithets."
by AbzuInExile January 31, 2026
Get the Political Problem of Pseudoscience mug.The perspective that the entire arena of politics—left vs. right, the issues that matter, the very idea of what government should do—is not a reflection of natural human divisions, but a constructed battlefield. Ideologies, parties, and political identities are built over time through media, education, and leaders to organize conflict, allocate resources, and give meaning to social life.
Example: "The 'culture war' issue of the 1850s was slavery. Today it's gender identity. The Theory of Constructed Politics says the fundamental conflict isn't natural; the battleground is constructed. Political elites and media build salience around certain issues to mobilize groups, constructing 'us vs. them' around whatever symbols and fears will hold a coalition together at the time."
by Abzu Land January 31, 2026
Get the Theory of Constructed Politics mug.