Pronounced rule (maybe misspelled because they are trying to be hip?), this is an overpriced new line from Abercrombie targeting older consumers that is definately not worth your money. Hint: If you don't have $150 or more to spend on a pair of jeans go spend $70 at Abercrombie. If you don't have $70, go to Hollister and spend around $50. ALL THREE OF THESE STORES ARE FROM THE SAME CORPORATION AND THE JEANS ARE ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME! HOW DO THEY THINK THEY CAN CHARGE $150 FOR THE SAME PAIR OF JEANS????
Don't you think Abercrombie is trying to take advantage of people by charging double for the same item and justifying it by putting RUEHL on the label?
by yuppiegirl January 09, 2007
Pronounced rule (maybe misspelled because they are trying to be hip?), this is an overpriced new line from Abercrombie targeting older consumers that is definately not worth your money. Hint: If you don't have $150 or more to spend on a pair of jeans go spend $70 at Abercrombie. If you don't have $70, go to Hollister and spend around $50. ALL THREE OF THESE STORES ARE FROM THE SAME CORPORATION AND THE JEANS ARE ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME! HOW DO THEY THINK THEY CAN CHARGE $150 FOR THE SAME PAIR OF JEANS???? I'd rather spend a little more and buy a pair of seven jeans.
Don't you think Abercrombie is trying to take advantage of people by charging double for the same item and justifying it by putting RUEHL on the label?
by yuppiegirl January 07, 2007