One thing I’ve noticed over the last few years, after the credits roll, is that there are usually more clips, outtakes and gaffs that the director has decided to mix into the credits.
This film has two such items of interest. One turned out to be a scene which can best be described as a prequel for a possible/probable sequel. The main character was in a new and unrelated story scene talking with a new character.
The next one, much later on in the credits, seems to be what I can only describe, as not a prequel, not a sequel but a “postquel” as in 'post' meaning after movie.
This final scene was an actual continuation of the movie’s storyline, directly related to its content, with an unbelievable twist of the current storyline.
This film has two such items of interest. One turned out to be a scene which can best be described as a prequel for a possible/probable sequel. The main character was in a new and unrelated story scene talking with a new character.
The next one, much later on in the credits, seems to be what I can only describe, as not a prequel, not a sequel but a “postquel” as in 'post' meaning after movie.
This final scene was an actual continuation of the movie’s storyline, directly related to its content, with an unbelievable twist of the current storyline.
by Professor SeekMage November 26, 2016
opposite of a prequel; the third movie in a series when the series follows the pattern: debut, prequel, postquel
by FrogmanJ October 24, 2010