Cringeworthy climate change statements, initiatives, and propaganda.
Often using the words "combat", "tackle", "impact", and "sustainable".
Often using the words "combat", "tackle", "impact", and "sustainable".
by WomperWompWompy September 27, 2023
A better sounding name for an air pollution advocate usually paid by, interested in, or manipulated by the pollution-heavy industries. They usually claim themselves (falsely) to be an expert in environmental sciences. Their main purpose is to propagate pro-pollution attitude.
Probably Bjørn Lomborg was the only respectable climate sceptic but for now he does not support his former opinions anymore either.
by antiglobe October 28, 2010
The perpetual forecast of 71 and fluorescent in the office, despite the weather outside. Like climate controlled, except sinister.
by Rapevan March 18, 2009
A phrase commonly used during a recession to sophisticate a person's excuse for not paying for anything he should.
"In this economic climate, I'm afraid I simply cannot afford to realize the dividends in my portfolio."
"Sorry, I can't pay muh rent because of this economic climate."
"Gotta quarter? I'm homeless thanks to the gub'ment and this economic climate."
"Sorry, I can't pay muh rent because of this economic climate."
"Gotta quarter? I'm homeless thanks to the gub'ment and this economic climate."
by trionna & shiggity March 26, 2009
A person who terrorizes society by fear mongering about the change in climate to direct tax dollars to and incentives to their constituents
John and Al, notorious Climate Terrorists plead with congress that we need to shift our form of generating power because temperatures have risen.
by FF2K July 17, 2023
A term used instead of global warming because the full impact of human caused CO2 emissions isn't known to scientists, and many are predicting that worldwide heating of the atmosphere may cause changes in ocean currents, and therefore, in some cases, cooling of some areas like the Eastern seaboard of North America.
The existence of climate change is virtually undisputed by all the world's leading scientists. The only people who mock it are fools who have been duped by the echo chamber created by junk science manufactured by oil companies and car manufacturers, in short, those who have a vested instrest in the status quo.
Only a complete retard or a goof would believe that climate change isn't occuring, or that "left wing" envirotards are part of some vast conspiracy to make-believe that we are in the midst of the sixth great extinction. What possible motive would these pinko commies have to pretend that the climate is changing? What benefit would such chicken little posturing have to them? The answer is no benefit whatsoever.
If you aren't sure whose motives are suspect, think of the old Roman proverb "look to see who benefits". Enviromentalists don't have some secret hidden agenda, they sincerly just want to live on a habitable planet. They don't make money from saving forests. Who makes money, the corporations, or the environmentalists?
Think about it, as a person who probably acts in their own rational self interest, who is more likely to lie and cheat, the party who stands to make or lose money? Or the poor buffoon who just wants to save some owls, and maybe breathe clean air?
Does anyone really honestly think their car exhaust dissapears?
The existence of climate change is virtually undisputed by all the world's leading scientists. The only people who mock it are fools who have been duped by the echo chamber created by junk science manufactured by oil companies and car manufacturers, in short, those who have a vested instrest in the status quo.
Only a complete retard or a goof would believe that climate change isn't occuring, or that "left wing" envirotards are part of some vast conspiracy to make-believe that we are in the midst of the sixth great extinction. What possible motive would these pinko commies have to pretend that the climate is changing? What benefit would such chicken little posturing have to them? The answer is no benefit whatsoever.
If you aren't sure whose motives are suspect, think of the old Roman proverb "look to see who benefits". Enviromentalists don't have some secret hidden agenda, they sincerly just want to live on a habitable planet. They don't make money from saving forests. Who makes money, the corporations, or the environmentalists?
Think about it, as a person who probably acts in their own rational self interest, who is more likely to lie and cheat, the party who stands to make or lose money? Or the poor buffoon who just wants to save some owls, and maybe breathe clean air?
Does anyone really honestly think their car exhaust dissapears?
by moonbug November 17, 2006
When you suddenly have to take a piss because of a large fluctuation in temperature. Like form an eighty degree day to the nice, cool, sixty five of your house.
When you get up in the morning, you take a piss. Seconds later, you're in the (hot, steamy) shower, and you have to take another piss. But, instead of getting out, you just end up pissing all over the tiles of the shower. Here is a clearly defined Climate Piss.
by Ben E. May 16, 2008