Now I am a Christian, and I have faith in God. Im also a microbioligst and I fully embrace science just as well as I embrace the bible. I do not think I am better then anyone, I will not tell you your going to hell, I live as Christ did. People choose to love God because they believe God loves them as well, not because they are afraid of eternal damnation or at least thats not the reason I believe. I never understood why athiests make science to be the ever present enemy of God and religion. If God made the world and the laws of nature that govern it that would make him the greatest scientist ever known now wouldnt it? To use laws of the natural to try and discredit something that is supernatural would be considered futile. If God is a mere fairy tale then may I ask you why the account of genesis is the only religous text that has been under extreme scientific scrutiny? It it is a fallacy why would we bother?
As a scientist I would like to point out that under careful examination science is not the enemy of God but rather his ultimate complement. Maybe when some of you get older like me youl understand just how amzing the universe is. As far as proof goes I would like to point out that technicly it is impossible to prove anything exists including yourself. Its true, just study qauntum mechanics all things visible and invisible is a pure wave of condensed and uncondensed energy. When we observe energy such as light photons for example we cannot see what they consist of its just...there, wich would mean that light is uncreated and if light is uncreated then it would violate the law of cause and effect right? It does, but do we look at a lamp and and say to ourselves the light shining through it isnt real?
No ofcourse not. The origins of our universe do not infinitley traverse back in time everyone, eventually there was a beginning correct the big bang/God so if the universe was brought into existence by those to hypothesis' then that would mark the beginning of time itself thus bieng outside of time. So whether you believe in God or not in order for our universe to have existed there must have been another universe where our laws do not apply. Therefore sometimes the only thing that is logical is the illogical.
Besides, just by being intolerant and judgemental of Atheists, you are sinning. :)
'So by innocence you mean not an absense of experience, but an absense of illusions.'
'An absense of need for illusions,' he said. 'A love of and respect for what is right before your eyes.' "
-Anne Rice, The Vampire Lestat.
Weak atheism is essentially the same as agnosticism]. It states that since we have no proof of a God, we cannot know for sure that one exists. Strong atheism states that since we live in a scientific world where the existence of things is determined solely by their observability, we cannot assume anything unobservable to exist. God isn’t observable, therefore he doesn’t exist (cf. Occam’s Razor). This doesn't mean that an atheist wouldn't WANT to believe in God, it merely means that he has no REASON to believe in it/him.
Strong atheists often question the special treatment weak atheists – and theists – give to religion. If they believe that the tooth fairy or Santa Claus do not exist, why are they willing to give God a benefit of the doubt?
Strong atheism is often equated with religion since it takes a strong stance on the issue. This is, however, fallacious. Religion is not based on rationality, and strong atheists value rationality over fantasy. Therefore atheism is not parallel with religion.
- Free on Sunday!
- Get to focus on the now.
- No guilt!
- Can claim full responsibility for life's achievments.
- No afterlife. :(
- Must take responsibility for life's failures. Dang!
Atheism doesn't hold any answers to life's big questions. It won't tell you the meaning of life and it won't tell you how it all started. It's not a religion, not a philosophy, not a way of life. Atheism is quite simply *non-belief*.
#2: "I don't know for sure. The leading scientific theory right now is the Big Bang theory, but that has a few problems and might not be correct."
#1: "If there's no God then where do we know right from wrong from?"
#2: "Again, I don't know for sure, but the general theory is that we evolved this feature because social creatures do better if unit cohesion isn't hindered by constant murdering."
Atheism isn't about answers. It's not really about anything, actually.