–adjective
1. not involving questions of right or wrong; without moral quality; neither moral nor immoral.
2. having no moral standards, restraints, or principles; unaware of or indifferent to questions of right or wrong: a completely amoral person.
1. not involving questions of right or wrong; without moral quality; neither moral nor immoral.
2. having no moral standards, restraints, or principles; unaware of or indifferent to questions of right or wrong: a completely amoral person.
by twyzlur September 16, 2009
by Solid Mantis June 21, 2018
Not to be confused with "Immoral", A moral means "Absent of morals or moral reason". In the same way that "Atheist" means the "absence of religious belief".
Iam "Ok. I noticed that it seems to be the case that people vary in terms of what governs their behavior in the context of Freudian Psychology. How do I frame this properly?.... So... Let's start with the concept of a person's 'Drive'. You have your temperamental proclivities and these proclivities 'drive' your behavior (to whatever extent). In Freudian Psychology you have the Id (Instinct) Ego (Reality) Superego (Morality) and all people have these aspects within them. But to what degree are people 'Driven' by these different aspects of Psychology? Because it clearly varies. And how does it relate to their temperament in the context of the 'Big 5 personality traits'? So if you put all 3 on a scale like this
<Id------------Ego----------Superego>
1☝️ 2☝️
What causes someone to end up at point '1' I'm terms of their 'drive' as opposed to point '2'? So conscientious people tend to be conservative and conservatives tend to be religious. But not all religious people are priest. People higher in openness a usually liberal. Liberals seem less likely to be religious. But not all liberals are activist types. It seems as the activists are more heavily driven by Superego than non-activists. You could even say the radical types are more heavily driven by Superego (which is why the Social Justice movement is likened to a sort of faux religion). What is the cause for this and what causes someone to be 'Amoral' or more ID driven (for example hedonistic types)? Is it socialization?"
<Id------------Ego----------Superego>
1☝️ 2☝️
What causes someone to end up at point '1' I'm terms of their 'drive' as opposed to point '2'? So conscientious people tend to be conservative and conservatives tend to be religious. But not all religious people are priest. People higher in openness a usually liberal. Liberals seem less likely to be religious. But not all liberals are activist types. It seems as the activists are more heavily driven by Superego than non-activists. You could even say the radical types are more heavily driven by Superego (which is why the Social Justice movement is likened to a sort of faux religion). What is the cause for this and what causes someone to be 'Amoral' or more ID driven (for example hedonistic types)? Is it socialization?"
by Hym Iam May 12, 2022
Amore is a pretty, athletic girl. She loves to have fun. She does her very best to exceed expectations. She is the best at what she does. Amore is a loving soul that loves life. She loves the summer weather as much as she does winter. Amore can make you smile on the worst days. She is very picky when it comes to food and clothes. People recognize Amore's friendliness at first glance due to her natural beauty. Sometimes Amore can be negative at times but her intentions are never ill. Amore will be your best friend, and she will always spice up life!
by *****UNKNOWN***** December 8, 2017
by AllisonAwesomeSauce January 11, 2016
by Camdaddy December 1, 2003