5 definitions by tyciol
Actually it means "flat and smooth"
Pettan alone means flat. For example, the suffix -ko means "girl" (such as in meganeko, megane = glasses so glasses girl) so pettanko means a flat (chested) girl.
Tsuru means smooth. So smooth+flat.
Pettan alone means flat. For example, the suffix -ko means "girl" (such as in meganeko, megane = glasses so glasses girl) so pettanko means a flat (chested) girl.
Tsuru means smooth. So smooth+flat.
by tyciol April 11, 2011
A slang term originating in Poland meaning 'tiny'. Normally used in an ironic sense to refer to large folk.
by tyciol September 21, 2006
A portmanteau formed from bro and botox.
u inject brotox into the muscles u want to de-emphasize, its a new substance similar to botox (which paralyzes muscles for a number weeks - used for the face to reduce wrinkling), however brotox paralyzes muscles for only a few hours (it has a v.short half life) & is used for these kinds of matters. so u inject surrounding muscles which removes their involvement from the compound exercise leaving the target muscle uninhibited so it takes most of the load.
that way u can do any pulling moves u want, u dont have to worry about these funky variations where u look like ur taking a sh!t while focusing on mmc & all that rubbish
u inject brotox into the muscles u want to de-emphasize, its a new substance similar to botox (which paralyzes muscles for a number weeks - used for the face to reduce wrinkling), however brotox paralyzes muscles for only a few hours (it has a v.short half life) & is used for these kinds of matters. so u inject surrounding muscles which removes their involvement from the compound exercise leaving the target muscle uninhibited so it takes most of the load.
that way u can do any pulling moves u want, u dont have to worry about these funky variations where u look like ur taking a sh!t while focusing on mmc & all that rubbish
I just brotoxed my lats, now I can pull up using my glenohumeral-scapulac joint chain and not contribute to my internal rotation problems.
by tyciol January 25, 2011
Also zoosexual.
The distinction between zoosexual and one who engages in beastiality can't be made legally as animals can't consent to sex legally at any time.
For this same reason, a pedophile can never be legally protected by engaging in sex with a child., as children can not legally choose.
Outside of legal boundaries, the distinction IS made, though it should never be engaged in (as breaking the law is wrong). We all know children can choose, they're just not considered to be concious enough to choose. The same would apply to animals.
The statement that animals only prefer sex within their own species is wrong, as many animals do engage with sex with other animals as well as people. This usually results from sexual repression, deviancy within the species, or being raised apart from their species. This is actually quite similar to a zoophile, which would be a human example of an animal like this.
If the animal initiates sex with the person without violence or coersion through things like food, the animal obviously desires such sexual interaction, and it should be allowed.
It is obviously rape if the animal tries to escape or attack the human, and the human should be punished like any rapist. There's no such thing as an animal masochist to my knowledge, so that won't work as an excuse.
The most receptive animals to zoophiles will most likely be male animals, as their sex drive can drive them to inseminate and release their sperm into anything possible. Human males can likely identify with this urge, which leads to masturbation and sex with people the male finds unattractive. It could similarly happen to female animals in heat, though I've never observed an example of this.
The distinction between zoosexual and one who engages in beastiality can't be made legally as animals can't consent to sex legally at any time.
For this same reason, a pedophile can never be legally protected by engaging in sex with a child., as children can not legally choose.
Outside of legal boundaries, the distinction IS made, though it should never be engaged in (as breaking the law is wrong). We all know children can choose, they're just not considered to be concious enough to choose. The same would apply to animals.
The statement that animals only prefer sex within their own species is wrong, as many animals do engage with sex with other animals as well as people. This usually results from sexual repression, deviancy within the species, or being raised apart from their species. This is actually quite similar to a zoophile, which would be a human example of an animal like this.
If the animal initiates sex with the person without violence or coersion through things like food, the animal obviously desires such sexual interaction, and it should be allowed.
It is obviously rape if the animal tries to escape or attack the human, and the human should be punished like any rapist. There's no such thing as an animal masochist to my knowledge, so that won't work as an excuse.
The most receptive animals to zoophiles will most likely be male animals, as their sex drive can drive them to inseminate and release their sperm into anything possible. Human males can likely identify with this urge, which leads to masturbation and sex with people the male finds unattractive. It could similarly happen to female animals in heat, though I've never observed an example of this.
by tyciol January 13, 2005
adv. , adj.
I suppose.... fantastic... as it applies to a cat. Some guy posted a link to it and it wasn't here so I made it.
I suppose.... fantastic... as it applies to a cat. Some guy posted a link to it and it wasn't here so I made it.
by tyciol January 13, 2005