Theory of Logical Hegemony

The critical theory proposing that dominant groups maintain power not just through force or economics, but through control over what counts as "logical" in the first place. According to this theory, the rules of logic aren't universal and neutral—they're tools of hegemony, designed to privilege certain ways of thinking while marginalizing others. Western logic (non-contradiction, excluded middle, linear reasoning) becomes the standard against which all other reasoning is judged, making indigenous epistemologies, feminine modes of thought, and non-Western philosophies appear "illogical" simply because they operate by different rules. The theory of logical hegemony explains why "that doesn't make sense" often really means "that doesn't fit my cultural framework," and why marginalized groups are constantly forced to translate their experiences into dominant logical forms to be heard.

Example: "She invoked the theory of logical hegemony when her professor dismissed indigenous knowledge as 'unscientific.' 'You're not evaluating their logic,' she said. 'You're imposing yours. The hegemony of Western rationality decides what counts as knowledge, and everything else gets called myth.' The professor said she was being relativistic. She said he was being hegemonic. Neither convinced the other, but she felt better for naming it."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026

Logical Hegemony

The dominance of a particular logical system—usually Western formal logic with its laws of non-contradiction and excluded middle—as the universal standard for what counts as "rational thought." Logical hegemony operates when any reasoning that doesn't conform to this system is automatically dismissed as illogical, primitive, or irrational, without considering that other logical systems might exist. It's the assumption that Aristotle discovered the one true logic rather than that he developed one useful system among many possible ones. Under logical hegemony, paradoxical reasoning, dialectical logic, or non-dualistic thought patterns are treated as failures rather than alternatives.

Example: "When the Zen master's answer violated the law of non-contradiction, the philosopher declared him irrational—a perfect example of logical hegemony mistaking its own cultural preference for universal truth."

by Dumu The Void March 12, 2026