1. theorem: stuy<bxsci
2. proof: given s1=1 for no1 thinks stuy is better, t=2 for its ranking after bxsci, u=3, y=4 for bxsci b4 stuy, b=5 for the # of hours of sleep bxsci students get on a good day, x=6 for 666 bc we're all in hell, s2=7 for 7th pd lunch aka the only valid lunch pd, c=8 for i 8 michelles and got food poisoning again, i=9 for the # of hours of sleep bxsci students wish they got, (1)(2)(3)(4)<(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) = (4!)<(9!-4!) = 24<15120 = a true statement.
3. afterword: the above is an example of what bxsci math dept does to ur brain.
a) most likely theorized by a park student tryna skip to bc
b) bronks kids r hella smart, also hella high all the time
c) if he take aps and has a blue pupilpath, u kno he on drugs boi
d) harris field.
2. proof: given s1=1 for no1 thinks stuy is better, t=2 for its ranking after bxsci, u=3, y=4 for bxsci b4 stuy, b=5 for the # of hours of sleep bxsci students get on a good day, x=6 for 666 bc we're all in hell, s2=7 for 7th pd lunch aka the only valid lunch pd, c=8 for i 8 michelles and got food poisoning again, i=9 for the # of hours of sleep bxsci students wish they got, (1)(2)(3)(4)<(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) = (4!)<(9!-4!) = 24<15120 = a true statement.
3. afterword: the above is an example of what bxsci math dept does to ur brain.
a) most likely theorized by a park student tryna skip to bc
b) bronks kids r hella smart, also hella high all the time
c) if he take aps and has a blue pupilpath, u kno he on drugs boi
d) harris field.
stuy kid: stuy is better.
bxsci scholar: bxsci is better. its mathematically proven.
stuy kid: i-
bxsci scholar: recites bronx science theorem
bxsci scholar: bxsci is better. its mathematically proven.
stuy kid: i-
bxsci scholar: recites bronx science theorem
by stoppid February 25, 2019