"In geo-politics, there are no real friends or enemies, only friendly enemies or hostile friends" - Unknown -
The very dynamic theory of politics not between people or peoples of a region, but of the regions themselves. They can be as relatively simple as the 50 States of the USA and the Federal Government of that same entity to the highly complicated, such as the oil-producing Gulf States or the former USSR's constituent countries. Geo-Political relationships can also range from the fully justified to what would appear to be morally repugnant, but the actions themselves are purely neutral; the results of the actions are what should be subject to judgement calls.
The very dynamic theory of politics not between people or peoples of a region, but of the regions themselves. They can be as relatively simple as the 50 States of the USA and the Federal Government of that same entity to the highly complicated, such as the oil-producing Gulf States or the former USSR's constituent countries. Geo-Political relationships can also range from the fully justified to what would appear to be morally repugnant, but the actions themselves are purely neutral; the results of the actions are what should be subject to judgement calls.
Geo-Politics is in a constant state of flux depending on a lot of factors, from who holds the power to who has the resources to support an action. Some noted examples:
The USA allying with the USSR in WW II ( Germany was at the time a far bigger menace. Needless to say, the USSR's ideology would be eternally at conflict with ours.)
The Cold War that followed WW II was classic Geo-Politics at its best. Due to MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) ideology, there was no safe way the US and USSR could directly confront each other. So came the period of Tinpot Dictators supported by both sides and at least two major proxy wars ( Korea & Vietnam). The support to these oft times vicious and repressive regimes was concerned with controlling as much of the world as possible versus tending to the individuals needs in those countries.
With the fall of the Shah and the ascendancy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran posed a serious threat to Gulf stability. Though at no time would Saddam have been considered a friend, his military could serve to defuse the potential Iranian flashpoint. As such he was aided in his war with Iran (1981-1988). The two countries laid waste to each other, leaving the rest of the gulf in relative peace.
One of the most important geo-political happening in the present day is once again the Gulf states. By no means should the Shiekhs' of theose countries be called our friends; Islamic Shari'a law is in conflict with much of what the US Republic holds dear, and there are factions within those countries that would like to see the USA destoyed. But as long as they are in power though, they represent a stable supplier of a needed world economic commodity (Oil). As long as this is a needed commodity, do not expect too much change from that region. Iran also is once more a potential flashpoint in the region, nuclear ambitions aside.
Israel is not necessarily our friend either, though at least society-wise Christianity sprang from Judaism and politics-wise a Parliament ( Knesset) is closer to our Congress then Shari'a law. Even though that is the case, Israel still has its own agenda ( A safe haven for those of Hebraic descent), and at times they do not always work in the best interest of the USA. They have been overly heavy-handed at times, even if they also have made attempts to settle the mater using detente.
A full discourse on this topic would take up one book if not several; this is perhaps a basic definition of the term to perhaps invoke more independent research from the reader.
The USA allying with the USSR in WW II ( Germany was at the time a far bigger menace. Needless to say, the USSR's ideology would be eternally at conflict with ours.)
The Cold War that followed WW II was classic Geo-Politics at its best. Due to MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) ideology, there was no safe way the US and USSR could directly confront each other. So came the period of Tinpot Dictators supported by both sides and at least two major proxy wars ( Korea & Vietnam). The support to these oft times vicious and repressive regimes was concerned with controlling as much of the world as possible versus tending to the individuals needs in those countries.
With the fall of the Shah and the ascendancy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran posed a serious threat to Gulf stability. Though at no time would Saddam have been considered a friend, his military could serve to defuse the potential Iranian flashpoint. As such he was aided in his war with Iran (1981-1988). The two countries laid waste to each other, leaving the rest of the gulf in relative peace.
One of the most important geo-political happening in the present day is once again the Gulf states. By no means should the Shiekhs' of theose countries be called our friends; Islamic Shari'a law is in conflict with much of what the US Republic holds dear, and there are factions within those countries that would like to see the USA destoyed. But as long as they are in power though, they represent a stable supplier of a needed world economic commodity (Oil). As long as this is a needed commodity, do not expect too much change from that region. Iran also is once more a potential flashpoint in the region, nuclear ambitions aside.
Israel is not necessarily our friend either, though at least society-wise Christianity sprang from Judaism and politics-wise a Parliament ( Knesset) is closer to our Congress then Shari'a law. Even though that is the case, Israel still has its own agenda ( A safe haven for those of Hebraic descent), and at times they do not always work in the best interest of the USA. They have been overly heavy-handed at times, even if they also have made attempts to settle the mater using detente.
A full discourse on this topic would take up one book if not several; this is perhaps a basic definition of the term to perhaps invoke more independent research from the reader.
by Ironbrand February 1, 2007
Get the Geo-politics mug.A filler word pseudo smart people use to make their essays, conversations, or debates sound more interesting. In short, it means pertaining to an aforementioned area, and if no area is mentioned, globally.
Iraq is essential on a geopolitical scale.
Really? How so?
Think about it! (they clearly dont know the answer)
Really? How so?
Think about it! (they clearly dont know the answer)
by cheaaaaaaaaaaaaa January 16, 2009
Get the Geopolitical mug.Related Words
1. The study of politics on a larger, nationwide scale.
2. A word Bill O'Reilly throws around to make the person arguing with him look stupid. Bill usually says it to people when they question his stances on the Iraq war.
2. A word Bill O'Reilly throws around to make the person arguing with him look stupid. Bill usually says it to people when they question his stances on the Iraq war.
by Phil Deviant April 20, 2008
Get the Geopolitics mug.To speak in a sensitive manner about a demographic in a specific area that would otherwise be appropriate elsewhere. Typically done by individuals of the same background who originate from a different place.
Tyler: Man, I love vacationing in Mexico. The people here are so nice and great.
Wuan: Yeah. I wish Trump would get off of their asses and let them in already.
Tyler: Fuck no. I don't want any illegal beaners over there.
Wuan: You just talked about how great these people are. Now, suddenly, you hate Mexicans?
Tyler: No! I love Mexicans! I hate Mexican Americans! I was being geopolitically correct. They can thrive in or fuck up their own country if they want. But leave mine the fuck alone. I like it the way it is. I just needed a break from it is all. It's raining sensitive pansies over there what with BLM losers, Antifa, the dumbass fake metoo movement, LGBTQNBCNCISwhatever the fuck it is called babies, ILLEGAL immigrants demanding legal rights, feminazis, extreme leftists and rightists, and yada yada. I just wanted to relax, eat some authentic Mexican food, drink tequila, snort cocaine, and bang hookers.
Wuan: Ok. That last part wasn't geopolitically correct.
Tyler: Nah. That's what we call a stereotype.
Wuan: Yeah. I wish Trump would get off of their asses and let them in already.
Tyler: Fuck no. I don't want any illegal beaners over there.
Wuan: You just talked about how great these people are. Now, suddenly, you hate Mexicans?
Tyler: No! I love Mexicans! I hate Mexican Americans! I was being geopolitically correct. They can thrive in or fuck up their own country if they want. But leave mine the fuck alone. I like it the way it is. I just needed a break from it is all. It's raining sensitive pansies over there what with BLM losers, Antifa, the dumbass fake metoo movement, LGBTQNBCNCISwhatever the fuck it is called babies, ILLEGAL immigrants demanding legal rights, feminazis, extreme leftists and rightists, and yada yada. I just wanted to relax, eat some authentic Mexican food, drink tequila, snort cocaine, and bang hookers.
Wuan: Ok. That last part wasn't geopolitically correct.
Tyler: Nah. That's what we call a stereotype.
by The Anticlown February 6, 2018
Get the geopolitically correct mug.The study of how the private interests, familial connections, secret allegiances, and personal pathologies of national leaders clandestinely drive state policy, often subverting or overriding official ideology and strategic national interest. It's the recognition that geopolitics is not a clean game of rational actors, but is conducted by flawed humans whose vanity, grudges, friendships, and corrupt dealings can alter the fate of nations behind a veil of official rhetoric.
Example: A president launching a trade war not after a strategic review, but because a rival leader personally insulted them at a G7 dinner, is Geopolitics Under the Covers. It's the unspoken, personal driver—ego, a secret business deal for a crony, blackmail—that explains an otherwise irrational or disproportionate state action. Theory of Geopolitics Under the Covers
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 3, 2026
Get the Theory of Geopolitics Under the Covers mug.