Evidence Double Standards

The hypocritical application of radically different levels of scrutiny and standards for accepting evidence based on whether the evidence supports or challenges one's preferred conclusion. Evidence for the favored view is accepted with minimal question, while evidence against it is subjected to impossible, moving-target demands for perfection.

Example: An activist accepts a single, methodologically shaky study showing benefits of their preferred policy as "proof," but demands five gold-standard, multi-decade, replicative studies before accepting any evidence of potential harms—a classic Evidence Double Standards maneuver.

by Dumu The Void February 4, 2026

Double Bubble

(1) When a girl has both a big chest(Breasts) and big posterior(butt).
(2) When a guy eats a girl out and makes a wet pop.
(3) When a guy goes back in twice or orgasms twice inside a girl.

“Todd has been staring at Maria, he DEFINITELY wants that ‘Double Bubble’”

by ND1299338 February 5, 2026

Double Blind Spot Bias

When two major, reinforcing areas of ignorance coexist, creating a powerful, self-validating distortion. For example, a field might be blind to both its cultural bias and its commercial funding influences. Each blind spot protects the other; questioning one is dismissed by appealing to the rigor implied by the other.

Example: Nutrition science historically blind to both cultural dietary diversity and the massive funding influence of the food industry. This double blind spot bias produced "universal" dietary guidelines that reflected Western habits and industry interests, while dismissing other diets as unscientific.

by Dumu The Void February 9, 2026

Double-Blind Bias

The assumption that a double-blind protocol is a flawless truth machine, creating an infallible "fact." This bias ignores how the study's fundamental design, question framing, population selection, and statistical analysis are all loaded with human choices and cultural values before the first pill is blinded.

*Example: Citing a double-blind study "proving" a new antidepressant works, while ignoring that the study only measured a narrow, questionnaire-defined "depression" over 8 weeks in a hand-picked cohort, excluding people with complex comorbidities. The double-blind bias mistakes a specific, constructed result for universal, contextless truth.*

by Dumu The Void February 9, 2026

Logical Double Standards

The meta-fallacy of applying different logical standards to different participants in a discussion, typically demanding impeccable reasoning from your opponent while allowing yourself hand-waving, gut feelings, and outright contradictions. Logical double standards are the rhetorical equivalent of a tennis match where one player's shots must land inside the lines and the other's can land anywhere in the county. This fallacy is how someone can demand "proof" for climate change while accepting election fraud claims based on a single Facebook post, or require their opponent to cite peer-reviewed studies while offering their own opinions as self-evident truth. The double standard is invisible to the person wielding it, which is what makes it so effective and so infuriating.

Example: "The logical double standards were staggering. She had to provide sources for every claim; he could say 'everyone knows' and it was accepted. She had to address every point; he could ignore hers and repeat his. When she pointed out the double standard, he said that was just her opinion. The standards weren't double; they were whatever allowed him to feel right."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026