Theory of Global Enshittification

The theory, popularized by internet observers, that describes the inevitable lifecycle of digital platforms and, increasingly, everything else: first they're good to users, then they abuse users to benefit business customers, then they abuse both to benefit shareholders, and finally they become a hollowed-out shell of their former selves, optimized for extraction rather than utility. The theory of global enshittification explains why every app you love eventually becomes unusable, why quality declines as soon as a company goes public, and why it feels like the whole world is slowly getting worse in specifically annoying ways. It's not paranoia; it's capitalism.

Example: "He watched his favorite social media platform implement its thirtieth enshittification update—more ads, less content, features nobody asked for—and realized the theory of global enshittification was playing out in real time. The app had been good, then useful, then tolerable, and now it was just a slot machine designed to extract his attention and sell it to the highest bidder. He didn't delete it. That's how enshittification wins."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026

Theory of Logical Hegemony

The critical theory proposing that dominant groups maintain power not just through force or economics, but through control over what counts as "logical" in the first place. According to this theory, the rules of logic aren't universal and neutral—they're tools of hegemony, designed to privilege certain ways of thinking while marginalizing others. Western logic (non-contradiction, excluded middle, linear reasoning) becomes the standard against which all other reasoning is judged, making indigenous epistemologies, feminine modes of thought, and non-Western philosophies appear "illogical" simply because they operate by different rules. The theory of logical hegemony explains why "that doesn't make sense" often really means "that doesn't fit my cultural framework," and why marginalized groups are constantly forced to translate their experiences into dominant logical forms to be heard.

Example: "She invoked the theory of logical hegemony when her professor dismissed indigenous knowledge as 'unscientific.' 'You're not evaluating their logic,' she said. 'You're imposing yours. The hegemony of Western rationality decides what counts as knowledge, and everything else gets called myth.' The professor said she was being relativistic. She said he was being hegemonic. Neither convinced the other, but she felt better for naming it."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026

Theory of Logical Paradigms

The meta-theoretical framework proposing that logic itself operates within paradigms—historically situated frameworks that determine what counts as valid reasoning, what counts as evidence, and what counts as a conclusion. Just as scientific paradigms shift (Newton to Einstein), logical paradigms shift too, meaning that what was perfectly logical in one era becomes questionable in the next. The theory of logical paradigms explains why medieval scholars could logically prove the existence of God using premises everyone accepted, while modern logicians reject those same proofs as unsound. It's not that logic changed; it's that the paradigm within which logic operates shifted, taking the ground rules with it. Understanding logical paradigms means recognizing that your ironclad argument might be ironclad only within a framework that others don't share.

Example: "He tried to win an argument with his religious grandmother using modern scientific logic. She responded with logic from her paradigm—scripture, tradition, revelation. He cited studies; she cited Psalms. Neither was irrational; they were operating in different logical paradigms. The theory of logical paradigms explained the impasse but didn't resolve it. They agreed to disagree, which was the only logical move available."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026