Wikipedia has article links, urban dictionary has definition catalogues/numbers (both sites are also notorious for their sheer manipulation of their content by popular admin/userbase opinion)
1: Comparing wikipedia and ud lmfaooo
2: not a joke when it comes to the rabbit hole phenomenon
3: Indeed, that's what powers their user engagement
2: not a joke when it comes to the rabbit hole phenomenon
3: Indeed, that's what powers their user engagement
by Anonymous-553669 December 06, 2024
The time interval urban dictionary's 'anti-vote/rating-manipulation' works, that too all for a SINGLE device and IP! This means u can 2 - 3 upvotes/downvotes (from a single device/ip) in a single waking cycle/day - which adds up to 60 to 90 votes in a single month! That's not even speaking of the abundance of flies cesspool sites like these attract — offline/online meatpuppet troll forums - usually <,needless to say,> dedicated/related to the worst kinds of CULTS / "political" movements - who'll take out their time to do this from (obv.) several perhaps dozens/hundreds/thousands of devices/ip addresses, thereby exponentially amplifying "the effect" !
Six hours, along with the 'definitions-made-ever-faster-than-takedowns' phenomenon, renders urban dictionary a useless, worse-than-slum 'dictionary' site, comparable to 4chan / the generic-name subreddits, where the VOTES, ATLEAST should be of the last concern / no concern AT ALL. (Obviously, i.e., if u haven't left this site for the better, unlike me 😞)
by Anonymous-553669 March 20, 2024