Lynch is that female badass, in the mold of Stone Cold Steve Austin, that the company has craved, but she’s seized her moment by emphasizing character traits that wrestling fans typically equate with male performers. She’s not a sex symbol. She doesn’t smile for the cameras. She doesn’t beg for your affection.
Take it or leave it, she is who she is: The Man.
Take it or leave it, she is who she is: The Man.
by BITW PUNK November 26, 2018
man man is a man that has became a man because the old man man has killed the fake man man but he died like a man so a man has became man man to replace the old man man and created the unique man language
by riganman!@# April 28, 2020
by A_Dude September 7, 2013
Man is the creation of man, both in the biblical and the biological sense.
The biblical in regards to our greatness. A greatness which is so great that, in fact, we have to conceptualize a God or superior being which has no legitimate evidence (apart from theoretical and idealogical texts) of its existence.
Man is God, and therefore man creates God, just as man creates man.
In biological terms, man creates man through simple fucking. Whether it be through lust, or lust and love, we create an offspring to kick off what we call the next generation of human - that is, the next generation human which is relevant to our time of existence. And so on and so forth.
In truth, if there is any meaning to life, it's to learn, develop oneself, and to create. Whether it be through love making, solving a mathematical equation using creative original methods which have been spawned from derivatives created by other mathematicians, or simply exercising one's brain and physique and establishing ones own rules and ethics in order to improve thyself, man's potential lies within man itself.
Man is the general conception of the human being. Male and female, or female or male; it doesn't matter.
The biblical in regards to our greatness. A greatness which is so great that, in fact, we have to conceptualize a God or superior being which has no legitimate evidence (apart from theoretical and idealogical texts) of its existence.
Man is God, and therefore man creates God, just as man creates man.
In biological terms, man creates man through simple fucking. Whether it be through lust, or lust and love, we create an offspring to kick off what we call the next generation of human - that is, the next generation human which is relevant to our time of existence. And so on and so forth.
In truth, if there is any meaning to life, it's to learn, develop oneself, and to create. Whether it be through love making, solving a mathematical equation using creative original methods which have been spawned from derivatives created by other mathematicians, or simply exercising one's brain and physique and establishing ones own rules and ethics in order to improve thyself, man's potential lies within man itself.
Man is the general conception of the human being. Male and female, or female or male; it doesn't matter.
For thousands of years man has evolved and developed through the creation of solid objects, fundamentals which have lead to concepts, ideals, and breeding.
We have invented languages; given meaning to our own morals, existences and the items which we take under our wings as ownerships; and discovered the unknown by setting forth to conquer to and to achieve.
"Not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
We are the representation of the perfect being. So perfect, that we have to think of perfect as a complete step up far and beyond our own expectations, which we invent ourselves (the irony is that this perfection can be achieved, because we can conceive of it and understand it). We even invent the concept of conscience, or thought.
These simple things are what carve dirt roads on the pathways, only to be paved by cement and thus studied in order to create more resourceful and effective materials to cover with once more. That is evolution; we define evolution in simple day-to-day life. It's the highest form of comprehension.
What lies beyond that? We do not know, nor can we comprehend. We're simply not ready for that...yet.
We have invented languages; given meaning to our own morals, existences and the items which we take under our wings as ownerships; and discovered the unknown by setting forth to conquer to and to achieve.
"Not because they are easy, but because they are hard."
We are the representation of the perfect being. So perfect, that we have to think of perfect as a complete step up far and beyond our own expectations, which we invent ourselves (the irony is that this perfection can be achieved, because we can conceive of it and understand it). We even invent the concept of conscience, or thought.
These simple things are what carve dirt roads on the pathways, only to be paved by cement and thus studied in order to create more resourceful and effective materials to cover with once more. That is evolution; we define evolution in simple day-to-day life. It's the highest form of comprehension.
What lies beyond that? We do not know, nor can we comprehend. We're simply not ready for that...yet.
by the product of thought May 4, 2010
My four year old son hates going shopping with mommy. He's a total man's man- he only wants to do boy activites with his dad.
by Hallie Hennessey April 9, 2006
A word used to describe any person over the age of 18 who is created from the XY chromosome pair. In more a more every-day use of the word, "Man" can be used to address someone, express annoyance and concisely state that someone is masculine.
Person 1: Hey man, what's up?
Person 2: Not much.
Person 1: We've got maths next have you done the homework?
Person 2: Oh man!
Person 1: What do you think of Ollie Smith?
Peron 2: He IS MAN!!!!!!
Person 2: Not much.
Person 1: We've got maths next have you done the homework?
Person 2: Oh man!
Person 1: What do you think of Ollie Smith?
Peron 2: He IS MAN!!!!!!
by CatsArePro November 2, 2010
Someone who wouldn't make the following mistakes:
The "Dear editor" entry for the definition of "man" endorses descrimination, despite quoting the rules: "Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it".
"90% are useless, worthless arseholes" - that applies not to men, but rather to users of urban dictionary, which is a small subset of "people".
The entry is also duplicated several times.
The "Dear editor" entry for the definition of "man" endorses descrimination, despite quoting the rules: "Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it".
"90% are useless, worthless arseholes" - that applies not to men, but rather to users of urban dictionary, which is a small subset of "people".
The entry is also duplicated several times.
by E Way October 22, 2012