darwin, charles was a alcoholic man with suicide inclinations, a huge white barb and a amateur interest for the nature. Inspired by his 33th grade freemason grandfather, erasmus darwin, the absurd theories of malthus and other primitive inanities, he considered his theory of evolution, by natural selection, which is scientifically collapsed today. (But with a simple research, you can find some idiots who still do believe in darwinism: dawkins, stephen jay gould, douglas futuyma, ...
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
This "theory of evolution by natural selection" gave rise to doubts from the very first:
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
by darwinism refuted April 14, 2009
by TAlyna February 1, 2018
A semi-scientific philosophy which claims that all life exists as a result of highly improbable circumstances and haphazard mutations a.k.a. "hopeful monsters." Darwinists have a tendency to proclaim that Darwinian evolution can account for everything (frog to a prince) while also appealing to ignorance in the face of massive gaps in their philosophy.
Darwinism is closely related to naturalism.
Darwinism is closely related to naturalism.
by scenester November 16, 2005
To be looking at two pieces of evidence and concluding that they produced a third piece of evidence totally unrelated.
Dude, what is you brain fucking made out of meatloaf!? There is no way those two dogs gave birth to a non-dog, you must have been darwined high school.
by Word-slinger December 21, 2015
Tayla😈
by bbybbybbybby:) November 25, 2019
To restrict access to a place to prevent someone from getting a Darwin Award by killing themselves with the sheer stupidity of their actions.
Friend 1: "Hey, did you hear about the amusement park ride closing?"
Friend 2: "Yeah, I heard that they had to darwin-proof it because some idiot broke the restraints for a selfie."
Friend 2: "Yeah, I heard that they had to darwin-proof it because some idiot broke the restraints for a selfie."
by SupaGamer2017 April 21, 2021
When someone is so stupid, and makes such dangerous life decisions they should have died. However they live on to make more bad choices.
This is a reference to those who accidentally kill themselves and are given the "darwin award" implying they died due to their lack of being evolved along with the remainder of the human race and their genes are being eliminated.
This is a reference to those who accidentally kill themselves and are given the "darwin award" implying they died due to their lack of being evolved along with the remainder of the human race and their genes are being eliminated.
1) Can you believe he survived that fall? He is a total darwin outlaw.
2) I wish that darwin outlaw would be brought to justice.
2) I wish that darwin outlaw would be brought to justice.
by clownsec December 17, 2014