by Fox Gaming45 December 21, 2017
person 1: (Long essay)
person 2: I aint reading allat
person 3: whos reading allat
person 1: shut the fuck up you to fatasses
person 2: I aint reading allat
person 3: whos reading allat
person 1: shut the fuck up you to fatasses
by eric89391 October 24, 2023
exclamation that one says in which one knows they are drunk/high but still does an amazing feat such as beating another person at chess or driving home perfectly
Dude1: man u just beat me at chess i thought u were high?
Dude2: Aint i awesome?
Dude1: how the fuck are we home dude your drunk out of your mind
Dude2: Aint i Awesome?
Dude2: Aint i awesome?
Dude1: how the fuck are we home dude your drunk out of your mind
Dude2: Aint i Awesome?
by billnye2 September 3, 2010
by Noplzno April 26, 2017
by Teepee73 March 17, 2021
This bitch definately be val~i~aint!
by garbertronic March 31, 2017
The writer suggests we 'hold up', signalling the xenoliterary statement about to be delivered to us, and him suggesting us to in fact hold up in order to properly process what he is about to say.
It is obvious to anyone the line is not meant to be complimentary, in fact, the statement is intended as an insult!
Now, of course, you ask yourself, "well, who is Nathaniel B? if he's trying to insult him why not compare him to someone we know?".
This is the wrong way to approach the analysis.
Of course, don't feel bad, it takes a learned individual to understand concepts of this nature, especially a concept that flirts so sensitively with the metaphysical.
If the young man were to compare the other man to someone generally perceived as negative, if he'd compared him to an infamous celebrity, or perhaps someone local to the group of people who is known as being less than savoury - there would be no magic.
The real genius here is the fact that we, and seemingly even the audience present, have no idea who this "Nathaniel B" is.
He is an enigma, a John Doe, a D.B Cooper.
So how would it be an insult? Well here's where it becomes Shakespearian.
It is obvious from the man's delivery and intellect - of course, he must be at the top level of literary scholars to think of a line like this on the spot - that he knows who Nathaniel B is.
Effectively with one line he is telling us he created this man, and he is the only one who can judge him, and assumedly his judgement is negative.
It is obvious to anyone the line is not meant to be complimentary, in fact, the statement is intended as an insult!
Now, of course, you ask yourself, "well, who is Nathaniel B? if he's trying to insult him why not compare him to someone we know?".
This is the wrong way to approach the analysis.
Of course, don't feel bad, it takes a learned individual to understand concepts of this nature, especially a concept that flirts so sensitively with the metaphysical.
If the young man were to compare the other man to someone generally perceived as negative, if he'd compared him to an infamous celebrity, or perhaps someone local to the group of people who is known as being less than savoury - there would be no magic.
The real genius here is the fact that we, and seemingly even the audience present, have no idea who this "Nathaniel B" is.
He is an enigma, a John Doe, a D.B Cooper.
So how would it be an insult? Well here's where it becomes Shakespearian.
It is obvious from the man's delivery and intellect - of course, he must be at the top level of literary scholars to think of a line like this on the spot - that he knows who Nathaniel B is.
Effectively with one line he is telling us he created this man, and he is the only one who can judge him, and assumedly his judgement is negative.
by aintyou_nathanielb August 7, 2022