When a "friend" decides to troll or duly express themselves several times within a short amount of time on Facebook, thereby appearing in consecutive posts.
This tends to raise ragemetere very fast when you're trying to creep on some hot wimminz.
This tends to raise ragemetere very fast when you're trying to creep on some hot wimminz.
Chester: There's a reason China doesn't have facebook..
Charles: What's the reason for this?
Chester: To avoid adding newsfeed pollution to their Intranets and causing strain for their filters.
Charles: Ingenious the Communists!
DatNigkaSoWavey: shieeeet... dem hoeS frOm dAt pArtY la$t wUzz blOwingG mA nEwsfeeD and polluttin it.
Broseph: I see my niqqa.
Charles: What's the reason for this?
Chester: To avoid adding newsfeed pollution to their Intranets and causing strain for their filters.
Charles: Ingenious the Communists!
DatNigkaSoWavey: shieeeet... dem hoeS frOm dAt pArtY la$t wUzz blOwingG mA nEwsfeeD and polluttin it.
Broseph: I see my niqqa.
by phoreals August 22, 2011
Get the newsfeed pollution mug.A person entering a, usually controversial, discussion with the most surface-level, stereotype-based, and hyperbolic arguments possible. Their take then becomes the easy go-to meme response that spreads, resulting in a form of Flanderization for the discussion as a whole, cutting any nuance or complexity to the discourse and adding undeserved importance to it.
Some of the more prevalent examples of this are in discussions of Fermi's paradox, where the go to is, "Aliens don't talk to us because we're stupid," despite how much it's implying about the aliens in question. And arguments about America not using the metric system, with the reason often being, "Americans are too stupid and lazy to understand it," forcing a stereotype and ignoring any actual reasons the US hasn't switched over.
Since these arguments are often done for quick validation, they often have little to no research backing them either due to overconfidence of being right, or an unconscious fear of having to think complexly.
Some of the more prevalent examples of this are in discussions of Fermi's paradox, where the go to is, "Aliens don't talk to us because we're stupid," despite how much it's implying about the aliens in question. And arguments about America not using the metric system, with the reason often being, "Americans are too stupid and lazy to understand it," forcing a stereotype and ignoring any actual reasons the US hasn't switched over.
Since these arguments are often done for quick validation, they often have little to no research backing them either due to overconfidence of being right, or an unconscious fear of having to think complexly.
commenter 1: omfg why don't Americans just switch to metric already, why are they too dumb to do government.
commenter 2: You could leave and google how states' rights work, fucking discussion pollution.
commenter 2: You could leave and google how states' rights work, fucking discussion pollution.
by dirtwashere April 9, 2023
Get the Discussion Pollution mug.by th3.D1_H8t3r September 8, 2023
Get the GolfCart Polluter mug.
Get the Ya pollution mug.When someone talks very rapidly about things you have little understanding, it's like the sound of an unwanted radio playing music that doesn't appeal to you.
by HookBeak66 September 15, 2022
Get the audio pollution mug.by atmospheric pollution January 6, 2022
Get the atmospheric pollution mug.The result of humans, or stupid apes that don't give a fu**. The thing that is irreversible in 10 years (from 2022) and will kill us before any other thing that a common idiot fears. In more detail it's unwanted gasses in the atmosphere that traps sunlight in our atmosphere causing the world to heat up, ice burns to melt, and then oceans rising. Fun isn't it?
by A coool persone April 20, 2022
Get the Pollution mug.