A high quality, ultra-compact MP3 player. Perhaps overpriced. Fits in the stereotype of Apple - slightly higher priced, but much higher software and hardware quality. Just because many of its trendwhore
owners are ignorant fools doesn't give you permission to hate it or be, in your opinion, non-conformist
Geoff: The $250 price tag is a complete waste of money when you could get a creative player or an iPod mini that holds more songs for less.
Me: You can't tell me the Creative matches the quality of construction or software compatibility. iTunes
Bas: $199 for a 2GB player? Or $179 for a 4GB Zen Micro? Or pay a premium $250 for an iriver H10 that has 150% more space and a nice design as well?
Me: Once again I point to software quality. The iRivers (cheap knockoff in more than one way) have bad interfaces and slower image loading times.
Pledet: "I sat on my ipod nano and broke it in two."
Me: You also sat on your walkman, shattering it and sending high-speed disc fragments up, in, and through your digestive system.