paper,sissors,rock 

Child game played by 2 people, You each have to hide youe hand behind your back and count 1,2,3 and then display what object you have chossen. i.e.

Paper
Sissors
Rock

Paper beats rock but not sissors, Sissors beats paper but not rock, rock beats sissors but not paper

also referred to as roshambo..Which is an name and the orginal name for it but this now means something else in American slang

lets decide what to do by playing paper,sissors,rock.

paper,sissors,rock by Allknowing May 10, 2008

Rock Paper Scissors

One of the most pointless and nonsensical game used to make small decisions.

I understand that Scissors can beat Paper, and I get how Rock can beat Scissors, but there's no fucking way Paper can beat Rock. Paper is supposed to magically wrap around Rock leaving it immobile? Why the hell cant paper do this to scissors? Screw scissors, why can't paper do this to people? Why isn't notebook paper constantly suffocating students while they take notes in class? I'll tell you why, because paper can't beat anybody, a rock would tear that shit up in 2 seconds. When I play rock/ paper/ scissors, I always choose rock. Then when somebody claims to beat me with their paper I can punch them in the face with my already clenched fist and say, oh shit, I'm sorry, I thought paper would protect you, you asshole.

Rock Paper Scissors by HAS 2006 December 8, 2004

paper rock scissors 

When someone above the age of thirty refers to the game of rock paper scissors.

You kids play paper rock scissors to see who gets to eat tonight.

paper rock scissors by Luridforest June 16, 2017

rock paper scissors extreme 

A game of rock paper scissors where the loser gets hurt according to how he lost
If they lose to:
Stone - The get a punch in the arm
Paper - A slap to the face
Scissors - A Nipple Cripple

Great for playing drunk normally someone ends up dead :D
Slaps are normally the worst
Remember I made this game up :D

Rock paper scissors EXTREME is just plain even have you seen my face!

rock paper scissors extreme by Jay Clarkson July 4, 2005

Rock Paper Scissors

1. A very pointless, unnecessary, and painful game: On a table are: a Large Rock (3+ pounds), New Extra-Coarse Sandpaper, and a large pair of Sharp Scissors. The game:

A Group of males sit around the table and masturbate in unison. "Rock...Paper...Scissors" is called out loud uniform to three pumps. At the end of the third pump a Rock, paper, or scissors hand gesture is made by each male, they must all be the same gesture in order to what gesture was made last 3 pumps (order rock, paper, scissors). If at anytime during the game a player uses a wrong hand gesture, that player loses and whatever hand gesture he used, he must use that object to harm his penis. If you ejaculate at any time during the game, you are disqualified. The object of the game is to last longer than any other player. You have to have good memory, or be a very early skeeter to play this game, or else you will leave with either a very deformed penis, or no penis at all. This game is much more unnecessary than soggy waffle.

If you lose: Either you will have to drop the huge rock directly on your penis. Or you will have to wrap Coarse sandpaper around it and masturbate with it. Or you will have to cut your meat off with the scissors.
(In the showers)
Frank: "Jimbo, what the hell happened to your penis? it looks like a dying slim jim!!!?"
Jimbo: "I played a game of Rock Paper Scissors...needless to say, I lost, got the sandpaper..."

Rock Paper Scissors by David Skeet Jr. May 1, 2008

Rock Paper Scissors

Perhaps one of the most ancient and widely respected games of all time that can be used in making any decision or just for good old fashoned entertainment.

(Kids playing a pickup game of football)
-I get to pick first
-No, I get to pick first!
-There's only one way to settle this!
Rock Paper Scissors

Rock Paper Scissors by Spencer Durham (FOOSBALL) December 18, 2008

rock-paper-scissors logic 

1. A flawed method of reasoning which states that if one thing can beat another, and that second thing can beat another thing, then the first thing can beat the third. In reality there are far too many factors involved for that to be consistantly true. It is ironicly named after the popular game of rock-paper-scissors which is a clear example of how it is faulty.

"Well, Link is powerful enough to defeat Ganon and Ganon was powerful enough to conquer Hyrule, so Link could conquer Hyrule too!" "No way. Stop using rock-paper-scissors logic."

rock-paper-scissors logic by Zaenos June 24, 2006