That's exactly what it means Chael. You are trying to turn my expression of free speak into nothing more than air so you can steal AI from me. Some expressions of free speech are worth more than others and an original theory of AI is what you would call a "dissertation." You do need to pay for it because I SAID you have to pay for it.
by Hym Iam September 21, 2025
Get the Copyrightmug. Get the definition for $999999.99
by PencilBuzz May 28, 2022
Get the Copyrightmug. Copyright is a system which protects a persons official work.
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
When someone copies, reproduces, or does anything to a protected work that recreates any original work in it, they are going against the rules of copyright. The original creator of that piece of work can sue the person who broke the rule against his work.
Remember that copyright does not protect even official work forever. When it is no longer protected by copyright, it becomes part of the public domain. This means people can now copy this piece of work.
You can get permission from the owner to copy the piece of work, and if he/she says yes, you can copy their work without any trouble.
Another thing you should know about copyright is "fair use." Fair use is a rule in which works can be used for purposes, like education, parodies, and more.
Other Fact:
There is even a symbol for copyright. (©)
*makes image of anime*
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
*her image pops up on some website*
"Hey, they didn't remember about my copyright!"
by cxr4 October 9, 2019
Get the Copyrightmug. if you so much as say the same word as some one already did, then copyright will fuck you in the ass
You fucking bastard, you used the word "Was" in a YouTube video, i'm gonna copy strike you! <-Example of deadly use of copyright.
by Reggie from Nintendo April 27, 2020
Get the copyrightmug. someone who will strike down anything and everything they deem is infringing on their copyright, even if the violation is very minor or can be rebuked. if the attempt fails, most commonly they will then sue the violator. they also might have ulterior motives.
someone : *uses a photo that's in the public domain in whatever*
someone else (copyright snowflake) : YOU CANT USE THAT
someone : uh, I bought this photo off a stock image website
copyright snowflake : I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about that formatting/editing style you're using, thats mine!
someone : its only like 2 seconds ffs, I can just change it or cut it out.
copyright snowflake : sorry! I have to send a strike!
someone else (copyright snowflake) : YOU CANT USE THAT
someone : uh, I bought this photo off a stock image website
copyright snowflake : I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about that formatting/editing style you're using, thats mine!
someone : its only like 2 seconds ffs, I can just change it or cut it out.
copyright snowflake : sorry! I have to send a strike!
by Xxnoobdestroyer29xX June 15, 2023
Get the copyright snowflakemug. by PhoneGuyYT April 22, 2025
Get the three copyright strikesmug. "Where (YouTube) merely assists an author in the creative process, its use does not change the copyrightability of the output,"
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
Hym "And what part of 'Using the existing architecture of narrative-interpreting AI in conjunction with a massive data set and a sophisticated compression algorithm (specifically to cut down on the energy cost)' is imperceptible? That's me. That is the 'they will be the author of AT LEAST that portion of the output. THAT is all that is happening here. The YouTube panhandlers wanted to get me for copyright infringement BUT THEY COULDN'T ESTABLISH INTENT. So they decided to engage in this retaliatory and deliberate and for profit copyright infringement campaign. For the YouTube freaks, the retaliatory nature of the act IS the expression of intent. It's cut and dry. It's no intent vs intent. Full forfeiture and restitution! They are also doing it for ideological reason which is a violation of my first amendment rights! Make the jew news pay for burying the story!"
by Hym Iam January 31, 2025
Get the Copyrightmug.