Political Marginalism

A political theory analyzing power through the value of the last, most incremental political action, promise, or unit of authority (the marginal political unit). It suggests that political capital, like any resource, has diminishing returns. A government's first actions in a crisis (e.g., disaster relief) have high utility and build legitimacy (cohesion). But the 10th micro-managing decree or broken campaign promise has low utility. It's often seen as purely about expanding control (coercion), eroding public trust. It asks: when does more politics become counterproductive?

Political Marginalism Example: During a pandemic, initial public health orders (like banning large gatherings) had high political marginal utility—they were broadly accepted as necessary for cohesion. But when the government then issues a highly specific, poorly justified order about the type of exercise allowed alone in a park, that last political unit is subjectively valued as low-utility coercion. According to political marginalism, this overreach weakens compliance with all orders, damaging the state's political cohesion.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026

Theory of Political Social Control

This focuses on how state power and governing institutions directly and indirectly manage the population to ensure compliance and maintain the current political order. It’s about the tools—from propaganda and surveillance to patriotism and legal frameworks—used to shape what citizens believe is possible, proper, and permissible.

Theory of Political Social Control Example: A government implementing a national "social credit" system. It’s direct political control: linking your legal rights (travel, loans) to a score based on your political compliance (e.g., attending rallies, criticizing officials online). It uses state power to coercively engineer specific citizen behavior and squash dissent, ensuring political stability through enforced conformity.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026

Political Marginalism

A political theory analyzing power through the value of the last, most incremental political action, promise, or unit of authority (the marginal political unit). It suggests that political capital, like any resource, has diminishing returns. A government's first actions in a crisis (e.g., disaster relief) have high utility and build legitimacy (cohesion). But the 10th micro-managing decree or broken campaign promise has low utility. It's often seen as purely about expanding control (coercion), eroding public trust. It asks: when does more politics become counterproductive?

Political Marginalism Example: During a pandemic, initial public health orders (like banning large gatherings) had high political marginal utility—they were broadly accepted as necessary for cohesion. But when the government then issues a highly specific, poorly justified order about the type of exercise allowed alone in a park, that last political unit is subjectively valued as low-utility coercion. According to political marginalism, this overreach weakens compliance with all orders, damaging the state's political cohesion.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026