Ethical

Something your hamster cage is not

Suzi: “Did you see Natalie’s TikTok?”
Pem: “Yeah, lady glitter sparkles cage doesn’t follow the ethical requirements”

by hamster brigade July 12, 2024

ethical racist

It means a person can admit he's racist and still treat people of other racial groups with ethical values, respect and politeness.

''Yeah, I'm a racist. I also treat people of other racial groups with respect and care. I'm an ethical racist".

by Magnumb,Private Eye September 15, 2022

Ethical Gooning

In other words, an "Ethical Gooner". Both meanings are very much the same. Ethical Gooning is someone who goons at a fictional character in any media who is 18 and/or over, and not an underage character, and any art that is not A.I.

Ethical Gooner 1: Oh god Rumi "Mirko" Usagiyama is so fucking hot. I wish I could be inside of her... Mmmmmm
Ethical Gooner 2: I need Yor Forger to finger my coochie so bad. Oh fuck yes~ Please yes~
Ethical Gooner 3: Loid Forger's dick would be great in my ass~
Ethical Gooner 4: It’s not A.I art and they are 18 and over; It’s gooning time!!!

All these are examples of Ethical Gooning

by Moimoi667 May 2, 2025

Ethical Obligation

I don't know it wouldn't be hard to say that your CONFLATING "criticism" with the thing you're ACTUALLY DOING.

Hym "You're a licensed professional and, therefore, have an ethical obligation to (either) do or not do certain things. You're freedom of speech does not give you the right to use speech as a mechanism to commit and/or participate in crime. This is something that a man who believes that 'the only TRUE consent is marriage' should understand. What you're doing is like feinting interest in your daughter and then banging her out without committing (which is exactly whats I WILL do in the future) OR lying and pretending to be Hym to get women (which probably works because I'm very erotic but STILL TECHNICALLY FRAUD). But where is the trial video. You said you would post a trial video and I have yet to see a trial video. That was a lie. You lied blatantly. You YELLED the lie. You said 'YOU THINK I WON'T POST IT!?' And I said 'Yes. Especially if it names me.' And then that's what happened. The thing I said. What you fail to understand is that MY thing didn't count. Your thing DOES count."

by Hym Iam August 25, 2023

Add "'_-_'" For Work Ethic Add

Add "'_-_'" For Work Ethic Add

Add "'_-_'" For Work Ethic Add

by Angel234IsTheDarkSeraphim April 16, 2025

Ethical gooning

To goon to fictional characters while understanding their complexity and character arcs.

M1: Yes i understand Yoko littners character and yes i still beat it to her.
M2: dude thats some ethical gooning

by FernGmod June 21, 2025

Ethical Emotivism

Your faux ethical dilemma regarding the organ transplant can only exist in a vaccum (Though you may be right that people do ENGAGE IN ethical emotivism). As I see it, your proposition isn't a singular linear line of reasoning. How you're thinking about it seems to be this: If you can -1 to +5 should you do that. But really your proposition is the intersection of several constituent elements regarding personal property rights (Does the person own their organs), consent (Is it ethical to take something from someone else without consent), authority (Is it ethical for a "We" to have authority over an individual). So, if yes (you ought to take the organs) do you have to reconcile with the constituent elements of the proposition? If it's ethical for "a group to take the organs from 1 to save 5 people" is it, then, also ethical for "a group to take the property of an individual without their consent" (in a broader sense)? Or are you just making a 1 time exception for this guy? Or is whether or not it's ethical contingent on what you're taking and whether or not you're saving lives? You see the distinction I'm trying to make, right? Maybe I'm not understanding it properly.

Hym "To me it just sounds like a repackaging of the trolley problem. And I don't see how it's incompatible with utilitarianism because if you aim to maximize pleasure then it's either a total of 1 unit of pleasure (1 person who continues to live so they can experience pleasure) or 5 units... Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying... I guess the distinction between the trolly problem and your thing IS the intersection of constituent elements. Rather than just deciding whether or not to switch the tracks you're deliberately putting a guy ON THE TRACK. So it's a little more direct I guess... You're slightly more culpable in the outcome... That's a good one though. That aside, I think ethical emotivism is something people engage in rather than the default. I do still think you can create a mathematical ethical scale. Like my thing! I kill a kid (-2), you kill me (-1), I get my stuff back (+1). That's all I got for now. Bring it back up later maybe I'll come up with something else. Hopefully that isn't too incoherent to understand."

by Hym Iam March 14, 2024