The pseudophilosophy problem is a logical, pragmatic and relativistic problem that understands the category of "pseudophilosophy" as a vague and bad category for analysis, such as being a category that is always biased into analytical philosophy and always excluding continental philosophy, metaphysics and other philosophical schools. Such as pseudophilosophy can also be used to refer to literally all kinds of philosophy in a broad definition of the word pseudophilosophy. Such as the term is usually used in a biased form to attack opposite schools of thought and complex concepts and texts such as the ones related to post-modernism and dialectics as if all philosophy should be as the analytical philosophy actually are.
"The pseudophilosophy problem is a really nice concept that shows how this concept is almost all the times in the defense of analytical philosophy, as if the whole philosophy should be literally as analytical philosophy actually are, where it is not true, everyone with philosophical education can understand dialectics and post-modernism, it is just the one wants to do it or the one learned to do not understand dialectics nor post-modernism."
"The pseudophilosophy problem is literally like the pseudoscience problem actually are, it only shows about how materialists and atheists always love to use of problematic terms to attack everyone they disagree with, as if everyone must be materialist and atheist."
"The pseudophilosophy problem is literally like the pseudoscience problem actually are, it only shows about how materialists and atheists always love to use of problematic terms to attack everyone they disagree with, as if everyone must be materialist and atheist."
by Full Monteirism March 1, 2021