a potential sexual attraction to non-binary identified individuals. This does not generally describe an attraction to specific genitalia or birth assignments but rather is an inclusive term.
by ekswm November 18, 2013
Not a good term to use, roots from meanings such as "bent", often associated with fetishizing and is problematic. Other definitions include attractions to non binary people and binary trans persons, coming off as fetishizing and transphobic (separating binary trans people from their genders that they are and treating them like a 3rd gender). This term also comes off as fetishizing to non binary persons and can often lead to objectification of non binary, and binary trans persons and bodies.
Better terms to use include the following :
Ceterosexual sounding similar to heterosexual however, is only for non binary people attracted to other non binary people. Its inclusive and an umbrella term that is without the negative connotations of skoliosexual.
Another one is allotroposexual. Whilst ceterosexual is a specific identity for non binary persons, allotroposexual is an option open for cisgendered people to use. Though the argument of fetishizing may also be used against this, it is better than skoliosexual as it does not have the negative connotations of skoliosexual, does not objectify the trans community, does not separate binary trans persons from their genders, and does not come of as fetishizing as the other does.
Better terms to use include the following :
Ceterosexual sounding similar to heterosexual however, is only for non binary people attracted to other non binary people. Its inclusive and an umbrella term that is without the negative connotations of skoliosexual.
Another one is allotroposexual. Whilst ceterosexual is a specific identity for non binary persons, allotroposexual is an option open for cisgendered people to use. Though the argument of fetishizing may also be used against this, it is better than skoliosexual as it does not have the negative connotations of skoliosexual, does not objectify the trans community, does not separate binary trans persons from their genders, and does not come of as fetishizing as the other does.
Kathy: Hey, that's Tyler over there
Jason: oh yeah, I heard he was skoliosexual?
Kathy: actually that's a negative and bad term and shouldn't be used
Tyler: hey guys!
Kathy: hey Tyler, just wanted to say that skoliosexual is a problematic term, how about Ceterosexual ig you're non binary or allotroposexual if you're cisgendered, don't want to assume!
Tyler: oh I'm sorry Kathy, I didn't realise, I'll look up those terms right now, thank you for telling me.
Jason: oh yeah, I heard he was skoliosexual?
Kathy: actually that's a negative and bad term and shouldn't be used
Tyler: hey guys!
Kathy: hey Tyler, just wanted to say that skoliosexual is a problematic term, how about Ceterosexual ig you're non binary or allotroposexual if you're cisgendered, don't want to assume!
Tyler: oh I'm sorry Kathy, I didn't realise, I'll look up those terms right now, thank you for telling me.
by VincentVanGogh🐇🐇 February 3, 2021
Sorry bitch, you might think you're hot but I'm only interested in people who aren't sure of what their gender is. So unless you're skoliosexual then get lost hun.
by Agnostic Priest January 21, 2023
You like someone who is can either be beyond or within gender boundaries. You can be tied with bi, pan, homo, or straight. You fall for people for their personality/attributes instead of looks.
Person 1: I'm skoliosexual
Person 2: I thought you were Bisexual?
Person 1: It can be a form of Bisexual
Person 2: I thought you were Bisexual?
Person 1: It can be a form of Bisexual
by Definitions3739 January 30, 2021
by suck_my_d33 June 29, 2021