Egotistical little pricks who delight in denying Urbandictionary definitions and Grouphug confessions. See also queer
I tried to make a halfway decent contribution to society and I got rejected by those damn moderators at Urbandictionary. Though they prefer the title "editors", because they like to feel for once as if they aren't insignificant retards.
by Paramore August 22, 2006
Yeah, you got your conservatives and your liberals, but how do you actually get anything done without the moderates making the deals?
by Brian X July 4, 2003
The ability to exercise self-control while enforcing one's will power to resist certain situations a person puts themselves in too often.
by die-nough-soar July 2, 2003
1. A person who, upon hearing the political arguments presented by both of the only two options available in the U.S., decides that both sides are run by crazy fanatics with no concept or reality. Upon realizing this, the moderate also comes to the conclusion that the only way to make progress is to aid both sides of the struggle to both make the favorable changes and fend off the unfavorable.
2. One who thinks before voting.
2. One who thinks before voting.
You've got your religious zealots on the right, and communist human haters on the left. Guess I'll have to be a moderate, it's the only choice for the sane.
by Anonymous August 18, 2003
A total control freak. Someone who either has no life or just has fun controlling yours. Can be a parent, older sibling, teacher, pastor, anyone who you're told and expected to listen to.
Man, my sister is such a moderator! She never let's me have friends over on weekdays, but she's always going out to places.
by The Final Countdown (dananana) August 29, 2007
The type of person liberals and conservatives are jealous of because they are the normal political type.
by Anonymous May 15, 2003
moderators or "mods"
Worthless,useless little pricks on internet forums whom are entirely unneccessary unless you have some sort of 'off topic' or 'general discussion' type of area but then the mods are totally useless because they are biased little pukes.The solution is either to have no such 'off topic' or 'general discussion' type of area or to just allow total free speech in such an area with "some" hard and fast rules about trolls and spammers.But people debating should just be allowed to fucking swear at eachother in 'no holds barred' fashion.Atleast it's fair.Or just simply don't have an 'off topic' general discussion area.But then the shitty little mods with all of their biases would be out of a job.
Worthless,useless little pricks on internet forums whom are entirely unneccessary unless you have some sort of 'off topic' or 'general discussion' type of area but then the mods are totally useless because they are biased little pukes.The solution is either to have no such 'off topic' or 'general discussion' type of area or to just allow total free speech in such an area with "some" hard and fast rules about trolls and spammers.But people debating should just be allowed to fucking swear at eachother in 'no holds barred' fashion.Atleast it's fair.Or just simply don't have an 'off topic' general discussion area.But then the shitty little mods with all of their biases would be out of a job.
No 'off topic' discusion = eliminates the need for moderators altogether.At most you might need a 'guide' to help keep things on topic or a 'bouncer' or 'enforcer' to ban the random dickheads.But generally things run pretty smoothly on their own as long as everybody on the forum sticks to the topic which everyone would do if you didn't have a stupid,useless 'off topic' discussion area.
Mods tend to be very biased and tend to nurture the retards on the forum which just perpetuates the flame wars.Mods are almost as bad as trolls and spammers.
Mods tend to be very biased and tend to nurture the retards on the forum which just perpetuates the flame wars.Mods are almost as bad as trolls and spammers.
by mods are fags August 31, 2005