Refers to either:
(1) The choicest doe in the herd for the antlered stud to have a good ol' bouncy-bouncy session with, or
(2) The ratio of cost vs. overall sexual pleasure/enjoyment offered by each of the "available" or "willing" ladies in a dude's general locale, i.e., which gal offers the greatest overall "satisfaction package" (beauty, brains, boobs, etc.) for the least amount of monetary investment.
(1) The choicest doe in the herd for the antlered stud to have a good ol' bouncy-bouncy session with, or
(2) The ratio of cost vs. overall sexual pleasure/enjoyment offered by each of the "available" or "willing" ladies in a dude's general locale, i.e., which gal offers the greatest overall "satisfaction package" (beauty, brains, boobs, etc.) for the least amount of monetary investment.
Generally speaking, the more gorgeous or "hot" a lady is, the more expensive she will be to date intimately. However, if you don't mind a gal with relatively minor aesthetic/personality drawbacks such as lots of freckles, some extra padding, slight overbite, or loud/airheaded/childish behavior, or if you're tolerant of mild-to-moderate physical/mental/emotional issues like thick glasses, a cane, an awkward stride, confusion/distress over simple matters, oddball interests, irrational phobias, etc., there may likely be one or more quite-attractive gals in your area who are currently "unattached" because most guys tend to pass them over for someone more outwardly desirable, but who would actually provide the best bang for the buck because they are both delightful to be around and don't expect to be financially pampered all that much.
by QuacksO February 21, 2018