arguementalist
arguementalist by Kahdlibber October 14, 2017
Get the arguementalist mug.
Related Words
Answers to Unanswerable Questions Through Countless Arguments and Stupid Statements by Stupid People
A future Nobel-prize winning, best selling book. With over 10 authors, including Matsuda, Richard, Lucy, Seymour, Alli, and TRK, this crazy group of debators takes on the task of answering such unanswerable questions as: "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?""Why did that chicken cross the road in the first place?", and "What is the plural of butter?" This crazy group of intelligent beings go head to head in this back and forth book of debates. The debators combine fact, personal opinion, and senseless rambling to prove their cases. This book WILL be published by 2011. And it WILL become a best-seller by 2013. People will love this book, and this is a first hand-sneak preview of what the future holds. This will be talked about on Oprah. They will make a movie out of it. Answers to Unanswerable Questions Through Countless Arguments and Stupid Statements by Stupid People is the product of evolution/creation debates in Lab Biology, other stupid arguments in Geometry, and exreme boredom.
straw man arguement
A locical fallacy in which the arguementative point is made into a caracature of it's original point. Extremely effective because it's not based on facts, but lies and assumptions. The burden of proof then lies in the defense, not the offense. Especially effective when the defense isn't allowed to offer objection. Popularized by right wing talk radio hosts Rush and Hannity.
Step one: Build the straw man. Ignore facts and make outlandish lies/slander. Redefine the facts. "liberals want to take your guns away and turn the U.S. over to the U.N."
Step 2: Knock down the straw man. "That flies in the face of everything we Americans believe in."
Step 3: Connect step 2 to step 1. "Only a communist would think of something like that."
Step 4: "Negate" your opponant by opposing the conclusion in step 3. "I hate those liberal communists. If they think us right-wingers will sit quietly while they destroy the country the're dead wrong."
Step one: Build the straw man. Ignore facts and make outlandish lies/slander. Redefine the facts. "liberals want to take your guns away and turn the U.S. over to the U.N."
Step 2: Knock down the straw man. "That flies in the face of everything we Americans believe in."
Step 3: Connect step 2 to step 1. "Only a communist would think of something like that."
Step 4: "Negate" your opponant by opposing the conclusion in step 3. "I hate those liberal communists. If they think us right-wingers will sit quietly while they destroy the country the're dead wrong."
Rush and Hannity can't argue the facts, so they have to make up the "evil liberal agenda" and then appear patriotic by opposing it.
straw man arguement by spot December 6, 2004
Political arguments
Political arguments by Person80 February 26, 2017
Agument
It’s an argument but less aggressive. When you are arguing with someone just because you are bored and mean no harm.
Since “R” is an aggressive sounding letter you take it out and pouf the word isn’t as aggressive sounding.
Since “R” is an aggressive sounding letter you take it out and pouf the word isn’t as aggressive sounding.
Bob: “I had a big agument with my girl the other day.”
Marley: “what’s an agument?”
Bob: “we were just arguing because we were bored, but arguing sounds offensive so I call it an agument.”
Marley: “what’s an agument?”
Bob: “we were just arguing because we were bored, but arguing sounds offensive so I call it an agument.”
Agument by RawChicken March 10, 2020