FaceParty, what I think comes from the definition, sit on my face and party, is a website dedicated to the communication of young and old alike.
What people decide to communicate is up to themself, hence the abdication of any form of intelligent life or originality. Once you create a profile on faceparty users can specify certain characteristics about themself and most importantly upload a picture (meant to be their face, but some morons do not understand this concept).
If you truely decide you want to embrace the culture of faceparty I'm affraid you either have to be a randy teenager , council dirty, or simply rather dull. Excluding myself of course, who likes to facilitate in mocking those below myself, more of a God like characteristic.
What people decide to communicate is up to themself, hence the abdication of any form of intelligent life or originality. Once you create a profile on faceparty users can specify certain characteristics about themself and most importantly upload a picture (meant to be their face, but some morons do not understand this concept).
If you truely decide you want to embrace the culture of faceparty I'm affraid you either have to be a randy teenager , council dirty, or simply rather dull. Excluding myself of course, who likes to facilitate in mocking those below myself, more of a God like characteristic.
I would list some examples of faceparty profiles that fit the bill but if you just use the browse facility on the site you would be able to see the overwhelming arrangement of monkey spankers for yourself!
by Erebos April 27, 2006
A failing social networking site falsely claiming to be the very first of it's kind - something you are forced to acknowledge as part of it's registration agreements. Unsurprisingly, the sites "agony aunt" section is hosted by a middle-aged, leather & swastika-clad "dungeon slapper" who openly adheres to fascist viewpoints, all very poorly disguised as satire. It's main target audience (or perhaps it's main attraction) appears to be infantile, mentally-underdeveloped under-18 chavs and chavvettes looking (by own admission in their profiles) for casual sex.
The site desperately coats itself with an heretic, anarchic and sleazy sex-shop theme to distinguish itself from rival (and far more popular) social networking sites, as well as portray itself to be more "street" and rebellious (see target user base).
Last year the site made history by introducing the internet's most retarded ban ever. As of 2008, over 36 year olds have been universally banned from the site solely due to their age. The reasoning for this ban is that it's "management" feared that everyone this age or over is bound to be a pedophile seeking to groom its predominant user base of under-18's. Therefore, under new UK laws, courtesy of FaceParty logic: a) every person over 36 with a social networking site is a suspected paedophile b) no one under this age could possibly ever be; and clearly, c) no actual peadophile would ever lie about their actual age as part of the online grooming process, why no, this has not been known to have happened before. Under these same new laws, it is however, perfectly acceptable for social network sites to subject its under-18 user base to various, excessive sexual content, coupled with frequent encouragement of posting indecent images of one another.
The site desperately coats itself with an heretic, anarchic and sleazy sex-shop theme to distinguish itself from rival (and far more popular) social networking sites, as well as portray itself to be more "street" and rebellious (see target user base).
Last year the site made history by introducing the internet's most retarded ban ever. As of 2008, over 36 year olds have been universally banned from the site solely due to their age. The reasoning for this ban is that it's "management" feared that everyone this age or over is bound to be a pedophile seeking to groom its predominant user base of under-18's. Therefore, under new UK laws, courtesy of FaceParty logic: a) every person over 36 with a social networking site is a suspected paedophile b) no one under this age could possibly ever be; and clearly, c) no actual peadophile would ever lie about their actual age as part of the online grooming process, why no, this has not been known to have happened before. Under these same new laws, it is however, perfectly acceptable for social network sites to subject its under-18 user base to various, excessive sexual content, coupled with frequent encouragement of posting indecent images of one another.
by deeaitch September 24, 2009