look up any word, like vai tomar no cu:
 
65.
A site that used to be funny as hell, you thought this site was awesome.
It used to be awesome in its earlier days
it is now run by a bunch of faggots who are EXACTLY what the articles are bashing
After you realize who USED to control the site
and who CURRENTLY controls the site, u realize its just the anonymous posters who edit shit, which is a lot of people,.

so being ED is not COOL

seriously, they're supporters of longcat and mudkipz and other loser shit now,

it used to be cool.
newfags think theyre shit on ED they talk about "the cancer thats killing /b/" and say shit just cuz ED says it, like fucking dogs

and "the cancer that is killing /b/ shit"
/b/ has been fucking dead for years

What about the fucking cancer that killed ED?

soooo....fuck all the current leaders of ED they're the fucking cancer.

remember, its not ED thats funny, i know u were thinking at first the bitchez on ED wrote the articles...dont deny it its not the people on ED that are "funny"...

BUT THE MILLIONS OF FUCKING PEOPLE WHO GO ON THE INTERNET EVERY FUCKING DAY, ALL THAT SHIT ON ED COULD BE WRITTEN BY FUCKING ANYBODY, AND EDITED AS THEY PLEASE

ED IS DEAD
steve: yo dude those Encyclopedia dramatica guys r fucking wicked

Me: no dumbshit its the random people all over the net, ED used to be fucking cool, now they suck dick, just look at the fucking admins and shit, fatass girlvinyl and the rest of the gang, pompous asses that think they're cool, arrogant as shit too, laugh when people talk bad about em, they'd probably point and laugh at this and block it out but the REAL Epimps would probably draw penises all over it and say "FRANKS N BEANS"

its a shame losers are taking control of everything, rock/glamrock=cool
alternative=gay
rap 50 n snoopdogg=cool
whatever that shit on the radio is=gay
hip hop usher/outkast=cool
that shit on the radio with the voice alter shit=gay
metal megadeth iron maiden=cool
nu metal=gay
50-to-69 cars=cool
supras and mazdas=gay
internet 90's to '05=when only smartass epimps knew how to use computers
'05 to present=any dumbfuck can get on the internet.

WE NEED 2012

P.S. pleez put this up, its probably the only truth about ED on here
by EX-troll, EX-/b/tard,EX-epimp February 15, 2010
50 23
 
1.
Where facts die, and stereotypes lie.
Encyclopedia Dramatica.
by Enterweb May 24, 2006
7328 1573
 
2.
A wiki-based collaborative site humour cataloguing internet culture, memes and internet drama, especially relating to livejournal, 4chan, wikipedia and troll activites lampooning virtually all popular subcultures taking a crude and ill-restrained approach. It shouldn't be taken too seriously.
encyclopedia dramatica; i did it for the lulz.
by forgreatjustice February 15, 2007
3844 1095
 
3.
A group of former /b/tards that were banned from 4chan for posting child porn. These former /b/tards (now just "tards") went and vandalized 4chan's Wikipedia article, and were promptly banned from there, too. Out of bitterness, these people began Encyclopedia Dramatica as a way to get back at the Internet and fill the gigantic void where their e-cocks used to be. Articles on Encyclopedia Dramatica usually consist of websites or people which are all branded as "unfunny" and/or "gay" because Encyclopedia Dramatica is the Absolute Internet Judge Of All That Is Funny And/Or Gay.
The pedophile was banned from a website, so he wrote an article about the website on Encyclopedia Dramatica.
by Dark Chaos November 09, 2006
3769 2047
 
4.
A website dedicated to parodying mainly popular things on the internet, in the style of Wikipedia. Stuff they have articles on include memes and macros, amongst others. They also have articles on chatspeak, popular websites, and usergroups. Their articles usually contain little actual facts, and make little to no sense IRL. The site has been bashed for many reasons, due to it's innapropriate, borderline porn-site content, and making fun of topics often seen as serious. They mean it when they say they "do it for the lulz" (which is a popular phrase with users). However, the site was obviously not meant to be taken seriously, as many people will probably tell others who seem enraged by it. However, many also view Encyclopedia Dramatica as "going too far", because many times they not only parody certain topics, but spam and hack websites relating to that topic and post their content and opinions on there, too. They even poke fun at certain users on certain websites, these users often furious at what is said about them.
Personally, I find some of the content on ED (as it is commonly abbreviated) funny, even hilarious at times. However, some content does seem offensing if it bashes things I like or do. If this happens, I just remind myself it is only a website, and proceed to do something else. I know it sounds corny, but that's my advice to you if you are ever pissed off by that site. Remember, if you hate someone, but they haven't done anything illegal, you can't get them arrested. Same goes for ED. If you can't handle ED, you shouldn't look on there, and if you can't avoid it, then throw your modem out the window because you can't handle the internet. Note, however, that users who are parodied on there may experience different emotions due to users often flaming them when they object.
ED even has an IRC chat room, but I am a noob therefore I do not go in it. You might wanna though. I have no idea what's in there and no intention of finding out.
Just one more thing: THE SITE IS NOT SAFE FOR WORK I AM DEAD SERIOUS DO NOT SURF IT ON A PUBLIC COMPUTER.
Another thing, if you are squemish or offended easily by pictures, do not go on their either. Almost every page links to a page with a "disturbing" pic.
I bet the people from Encyclopedia Dramatica will give this definition thumbs down because it says not to take it seriously.
by UDArticleMakerandorEditor June 27, 2007
1605 539
 
5.
A failed attempt at a Wikipedia parody that is actually a cover for a non-stop bitching and whining fest, in which it's users insult things for simply being popular to give off the illusion of being iconoclastic or edgy.

For every entry that may actually be funny, there are at least five that are simply a twenty year old loser coming up with sentences to fit the word faggotry into while "sticking it" to some sub-culture of people no one in their right minds gives two shits about.

Tips for the budding ED writer:

Believe that the word "lulz" is some magical incantation that successfully shields you from potential scrutiny. Apparently when you do everything that your site condemns, you are no longer a neckbeard basement dweller, obsessed loser if you write for ED and use "I did it for teh lulz" as an opening disclaimer.

Each entry should read like the World's Angriest Mad Lib. Take X (the subject that will garner the most "look at me, I need attention because no one loves me" points) then start with a stupid origin ripped from the previous 500 entries. Swear a lot. Link to no less than 400 other entries, 200 of which should be their lame inside jokes/memes that are somehow less retarded than everyone else's. Annie may! Betty Sue! 100 years ago! *wipes tear* Pure comedy gold.

Basically just copy and past a previous entry, take out the subject key words, add a few "faggotry's" and cock/gay/nigger/Jew/Nazi/rape jokes to it and call it a day. That way, you can rest assured knowing you pissed off some random people for no real reason.

When people get upset, pretend that no one is supposed to take it seriously (at least, not more seriously than you do) and that you know what parody or satire looks like. Also stand by the false assumption that you are funny and that anyone who simply finds the complete reliance on the same five stale jokes lame doesn't have a sense of humor. Also "funny" means biting everyone else's writing style to fit in.

You can be offensive and funny. Comedians do it all the time. However, there is a reason most of the ED writers are on ED. They just aren't funny.
Encyclopedia Dramatica is a nerd-run hate site disguised as a satirical Wikipedia but anyone with a half a brain can see through that paper thin pretense.
by FlowersInMidgar2 May 31, 2008
1074 321
 
6.
An "encyclopedia" where people go to bash things that they dont like, but the majority of people do. The meeting place for 13 year olds who dont have that many freinds and spend all of their life on the internet writing hate-shit about jews, youtube, blacks, arabs, and etc.
If you dont like the site, a little mid-pubescent boy will send his lulz minions to attack you with tr0lls.
You see many people describing hate for ED on Urban Dictionary. And you know what? They're mostly thumbed up.
Encyclopedia Dramatica is the most unfunniest pile of lies, racism, and shit that I've ever seen on the internet. Which, no, it's not serious business...I know you're being mocking of noobs, but how can you mock what you already are?
by Dr. Clash December 27, 2007
1257 606
 
7.
For any first-time web user looking to see what the internet (and, sub sequentially, its users) is really like, than look no further. From crude, childish humor to people who hate your band, Encyclopedia Dramatica is the perfect representation of what the interwebs is REALLY all about. Lampooning everything including itself, ED puts a funny and often offensive twist on every conglomerated experience (good, bad, or otherwise) you've ever had on the internet. Free from guilt, remorse, or liability, its authors poke fun at (read: insult) everything from Live Journal feuds to politics, gay marriage to women's rights. Be it video games or porn search engines, nothing is sacred, everything is up for grabs, and if its popular or blog-worthy, you'll most likely find someone tearing it a new one on Encyclopedia Dramatica.
Most weekend lesbians are also attention whores, and will never actually do the deed should the situation arise. This only compounds on their total stupidity, as telling someone about how you drunkenly kissed another girl is like bragging to a black person about a really deep tan you had once.
- Encyclopedia Dramatica on "Weekend Lesbians"
by VR_Jay May 12, 2007
1137 653