When a man does not have a full penis. It could also be referring to female circumcision, another outdated, barbaric practice.
There really is no purpose to circumcision. Some religions, such as Judaism, encourage parents to remove their child's foreskin at an early age, since they probably would reject doing it when they're older and capable of forming opinions.
Some might say that circumcision improves the sex life of a man, such as the writers of the other entries.
They might go on to say that "sex is 10 times better for uncircumcised men" is a lie, because it's not based on research. They'd probably also overlook their own claims, that a cut penis has a better taste and is more stimulating, when those aren't based on science, either.
Some women may say that a penis looks more aesthetic when cut. But then, if some guys find a circumcised woman to be beautiful, does that mean all women should get their clitoris removed?
A man always has a frenum, and doesn't "gain" one if he gets cut. But if he does, he loses the vast amount of nerves that lay in the foreskin, and won't be able to have an equal sexual experience.
Ideally, a parent should leave a child's genitals alone. It should be their job to teach their kids to responsibly clean their privates, rather than recklessly mutilate their organs for the sake of "hygiene." A man's penis will have the same taste and smell as a half-cocked man, by only spending an extra minute to clean it out everyday.
There really is no purpose to circumcision. Some religions, such as Judaism, encourage parents to remove their child's foreskin at an early age, since they probably would reject doing it when they're older and capable of forming opinions.
Some might say that circumcision improves the sex life of a man, such as the writers of the other entries.
They might go on to say that "sex is 10 times better for uncircumcised men" is a lie, because it's not based on research. They'd probably also overlook their own claims, that a cut penis has a better taste and is more stimulating, when those aren't based on science, either.
Some women may say that a penis looks more aesthetic when cut. But then, if some guys find a circumcised woman to be beautiful, does that mean all women should get their clitoris removed?
A man always has a frenum, and doesn't "gain" one if he gets cut. But if he does, he loses the vast amount of nerves that lay in the foreskin, and won't be able to have an equal sexual experience.
Ideally, a parent should leave a child's genitals alone. It should be their job to teach their kids to responsibly clean their privates, rather than recklessly mutilate their organs for the sake of "hygiene." A man's penis will have the same taste and smell as a half-cocked man, by only spending an extra minute to clean it out everyday.
My girlfriend said my penis looked strange, and that she couldn't sleep with me until I got it circumcised . A week after I got it done, she dumped me.
by Holy Foreskin October 25, 2008
Ian: Why are all those girls hanging around Evan?
Jeff: One of the cheerleaders slept with him and told the others that he's circumcisioned.
Ian: I totally understand what circumcision envy means now.
Jeff: One of the cheerleaders slept with him and told the others that he's circumcisioned.
Ian: I totally understand what circumcision envy means now.
by Rancho Rey April 17, 2010
The often considered barbaric surgical removal of the foreskin: a soft, sensitive peice of skin at the tip of the penis.
Curcumcision came to the US in the 1800s to discourage masterbation. Today there is no proven medical benefit of circumcsion. (cirp.org)
Curcumcision came to the US in the 1800s to discourage masterbation. Today there is no proven medical benefit of circumcsion. (cirp.org)
by CIRP January 18, 2004
Doctor: Would you like me to circumcise your newborn?
New Mom: Hmm, should I?
New Dad: What? Maul his cock? Ah fuck it, go ahead...
New Mom: Hmm, should I?
New Dad: What? Maul his cock? Ah fuck it, go ahead...
by Jocko Tam December 24, 2012
by tayylorr❀ September 26, 2020
Male genital mutilation.
Millions of years of evolution have decided that every male mammal under the sun was to be born with a foreskin. In nature you won’t find a single mammal species where the males are born without a foreskin. If the foreskin was a useless part of our anatomy, evolution would have gotten rid of it before we became human.
Circumcisions are performed on babied because they can’t complain as no adult in his right mind would subject himself to it.
Millions of years of evolution have decided that every male mammal under the sun was to be born with a foreskin. In nature you won’t find a single mammal species where the males are born without a foreskin. If the foreskin was a useless part of our anatomy, evolution would have gotten rid of it before we became human.
Circumcisions are performed on babied because they can’t complain as no adult in his right mind would subject himself to it.
Circumcision is barbaric and useless. It continues to this day only because it's practiced on innocent babies.
by ilbtna July 11, 2007