Scientific fringeism, also scientific marginalism and informally as fringology or fringeology, is an intellectual movement that advocates the study of fringe/marginal theories as serious theories. Scientific fringeism also advocates the creation of a fringe/marginal scientific community worldwide just for the study of fringe/marginal theories such as the creation of fringe/marginal experiments in order to see if some theory is really fringe/marginal or not. Scientific fringeism also advocates epistemological anarchism since it's the best system for the study of fringe/marginal theories and so on.
"Scientific fringeism is an interesting movement, it might be really useful for the study of fringe theories related to spirituality, esotericism, occultism and supernaturality, and even the development of areas such as occult sciences, esoteric sciences, spiritual sciences, supernatural sciences, extraphysical sciences, spiritology, esoterology, occultology, supernaturalology, occult psychology, esoteric psychology, logical supernaturalism, divinialism, agnosticology, agnosticography, deistology, deistography and so on.
by Full Monteirism March 17, 2021
Living by applying the scientific method to make the most important decisions, all along doing all one can to never make a decision based solely on an emotion.
Individuals who live scientifically make the most important decisions only after taking the scientific method's six steps: 1) asking a question, 2) doing background research, 3) constructing a hypothesis, 4) testing the hypothesis by doing an experiment, 5) analyzing the data and drawing a conclusion, and 6) writing down the results.
Scientific living also entails doing a great deal of observation, writing down as much as possible what one perceives, along with prioritizing, planning, and calculating likely outcomes.
The opposite of scientific living is living 'spur of the moment.'
Scientific living also entails doing a great deal of observation, writing down as much as possible what one perceives, along with prioritizing, planning, and calculating likely outcomes.
The opposite of scientific living is living 'spur of the moment.'
by but for January 7, 2018
Alcoholic beverage that humanities graduates consume while criticizing scientists, engineers and doctors.
India's rocket scientists pray at a Hindu temple before launching a mission to the moon.
Communists (mostly humanities graduates): We are ashamed with these rocket scientists' lack of scientific spirit.
Communists (mostly humanities graduates): We are ashamed with these rocket scientists' lack of scientific spirit.
by Bengal Hippo July 16, 2023
One who engages in scientific gasblowing, or offering unscientific opinions based upon poor understanding of the subject material, insufficient data, poor logic or reasoning.
That scientific pundit on the news didn't know what he was talking about when he gave that monologue about super-string theory, he was just reading the teleprompter. He's such a scientific gasblower...
by Michael Gmirkin June 13, 2008
Scientific fanaticism is a term used to refer to a form of fanaticism that takes science (scientism) into zealot levels, seeking to use all possible arguments and tactics to defend scientism and put natural sciences as an absolute truth. Scientific fanaticism is also very common among several scientific dissiminators on Internet and it is considered as an advanced form of scientism.
"Scientific fanaticism is no better than religious fanaticism, take natural sciences as an absolute truth is literally like take a religious belief as an absolute truth. Scientific fanaticism and scientism are bad such as religious fanaticism and atheist fanaticism actually are, even that scientific fanaticism is just scientism being taken to the extreme."
"It's ok to be a fan of science such as be religious, spiritual, deist, agnostic or atheist. But one must avoid becoming fanatical for any of those, there's a big difference between being enlightened and being a fanatical, one can be enlightened for any of those such as one can be fanatical for any of those."
"It's ok to be a fan of science such as be religious, spiritual, deist, agnostic or atheist. But one must avoid becoming fanatical for any of those, there's a big difference between being enlightened and being a fanatical, one can be enlightened for any of those such as one can be fanatical for any of those."
by Full Monteirism March 17, 2021
by BedHeadFred777 October 22, 2011
by t-dubya April 8, 2006