108 definitions by NATALIE
by NATALIE October 20, 2003
Some flipping acoholics, with no life, use this word excessively in random places that don't even make sense! UGH!
1. That was hurla Ann Smith.
2. We have some hurla shiz in the trunk.
3. She has hurla blonde hair.
4. What the hurl you talking about g-unit?!
2. We have some hurla shiz in the trunk.
3. She has hurla blonde hair.
4. What the hurl you talking about g-unit?!
by NATALIE February 5, 2005
John: Hey, im gonna fly, k?
Lisa: No, that was so last year, you need to land before anyone sees you.
Lisa: No, that was so last year, you need to land before anyone sees you.
by NATALIE February 3, 2005
a name given to anyone when trying to flee from a scene, not black , gansta orgin, more white, suburbia orgin, somthing to call your friends
by NATALIE July 15, 2003
by NATALIE February 14, 2005
a tiny fully formed individual that (according to the discredited theory of preformation) is supposed to be present in the sperm cell
Hippocrates and Aristotle proposed the idea of what they called pangenes, which they thought were tiny pieces of body parts. They thought that pangenes came together to make up the homunculus, a tiny pre-formed human that people thought grew into a baby. In the 1600s, the development of the microscope brought the discovery of eggs and sperm. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, using a primitive microscope, thought he saw the homunculus curled up in a sperm cell. His followers believed that the homunculus was in the sperm, the father “planted his seed,” and the mother just incubated and nourished the homunculus so it grew into a baby. On the other hand, Regnier de Graaf and his followers thought that they saw the homunculus in the egg, and the presence of semen just somehow stimulated its growth. In the 1800s, a very novel, “radical” idea arose: both parents contribute to the new baby, but people (even Darwin, as he proposed his theory) still believed that these contributions were in the form of pangenes.
Hippocrates and Aristotle proposed the idea of what they called pangenes, which they thought were tiny pieces of body parts. They thought that pangenes came together to make up the homunculus, a tiny pre-formed human that people thought grew into a baby. In the 1600s, the development of the microscope brought the discovery of eggs and sperm. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, using a primitive microscope, thought he saw the homunculus curled up in a sperm cell. His followers believed that the homunculus was in the sperm, the father “planted his seed,” and the mother just incubated and nourished the homunculus so it grew into a baby. On the other hand, Regnier de Graaf and his followers thought that they saw the homunculus in the egg, and the presence of semen just somehow stimulated its growth. In the 1800s, a very novel, “radical” idea arose: both parents contribute to the new baby, but people (even Darwin, as he proposed his theory) still believed that these contributions were in the form of pangenes.
by NATALIE March 2, 2005