When someone claims to be fishing for reactions and gets a reaction however is denied the fish due to them actually believing what they said. A fish will only be rewarded to fisher if the content used is controversial and something they don't actually believe is true.
Therefore the fishee has rights to an appeal if they believe the fisher was using their statement to form a true debate or argument but later claimed a fish after a reaction was received.
For example, Jordan was anti-fishing on many public forums regarding the Australian cricket team's ball tampering plot. But because the stance he took was a stance he believed in, all reactions he received were not counted as successful fishes.
It is said of the situation where a person has the bad luck to make contact with his testicles against an undefined surface or object, intentioned or not.
Given the nature of the word, it is more appropriate to design cases where the interaction is made with a moving object, for example, a ball.
Although it is extremely painful for the victim, it tends to be considerably funny to people who witness it.
Today in the baseball game the pitcher took a nutshot; the baseball hit him in the nuts.
Man, I just watched the funniest nutshot video ever.