drcruel's definitions
A pyramid scheme masquerading as a quasi-sociopolitical economic theory, first developed from the various writings of Karl Marx and Friederich Engels, and later embellished upon by intellectual luminaries such as Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Josef Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and Che Guevara. Often Marxists will attempt to misrepresent their system of ideas as something "progressive"; in truth the system in practice most resembles a form of secular feudalism.
Marxist societies, being in essence kleptocratic in form, invariably fail once the economy of the nation so ruled has been bled white. Thereafter such a failed nation is said by Marxists to have been instead an example of some form of proto-fascism; terms such as "Proletarian Bonapartism", "state capitalism", and other such equivalent nonsense. The equivalent is for Nazis to claim that a true fascist state has never existed, that detractors ought to read Mein Kampf to get the true story of what Nazism is truly about, etc (see David Irving).
A common misconception Marxists like to spread is that their system of economic and social management is codified in texts by Marx/Engels, such as Das Kapital. If one takes the time to read such texts, it becomes readily clear that not only are they woefully out of date (referring to issues that were important in the 19th century), but that for the most part the analyses the theory is based on is mostly utter nonsense (see "labour theory of value"). In actual practice both the analyses and theoretical applications of Marxism are meant for people at the bottom of the pyramid scheme to absorb; those at the top use the theory to justify mass thievery, mass murder and class genocide.
Marxism as a theory is a precursor to fascism and, later, Nazism. The key difference between these two systems is that early Marxists believed people should be robbed, enslaved and murdered based on their class and/or vocational identity; Nazism believes people should be robbed, enslaved and murdered based on their racial or ethnic identity. Otherwise there is virtually no difference, either in structural form or function.
Marxist societies, being in essence kleptocratic in form, invariably fail once the economy of the nation so ruled has been bled white. Thereafter such a failed nation is said by Marxists to have been instead an example of some form of proto-fascism; terms such as "Proletarian Bonapartism", "state capitalism", and other such equivalent nonsense. The equivalent is for Nazis to claim that a true fascist state has never existed, that detractors ought to read Mein Kampf to get the true story of what Nazism is truly about, etc (see David Irving).
A common misconception Marxists like to spread is that their system of economic and social management is codified in texts by Marx/Engels, such as Das Kapital. If one takes the time to read such texts, it becomes readily clear that not only are they woefully out of date (referring to issues that were important in the 19th century), but that for the most part the analyses the theory is based on is mostly utter nonsense (see "labour theory of value"). In actual practice both the analyses and theoretical applications of Marxism are meant for people at the bottom of the pyramid scheme to absorb; those at the top use the theory to justify mass thievery, mass murder and class genocide.
Marxism as a theory is a precursor to fascism and, later, Nazism. The key difference between these two systems is that early Marxists believed people should be robbed, enslaved and murdered based on their class and/or vocational identity; Nazism believes people should be robbed, enslaved and murdered based on their racial or ethnic identity. Otherwise there is virtually no difference, either in structural form or function.
Russian Bolshevism, Chinese Maoism and German Nazism are all forms of secular feudalism. All have their roots in Marxism, and all are most properly classified as movements of the Left.
by DrCruel July 12, 2006
Get the Marxism mug.1) (verb) to lie about and libel someone mercilessly, and in a most outrageous manner
2) (noun) an invented story meant to viciously insult some person or group (in the traditional sense, usually a prominent Israeli Jew or American politician, or the Israeli or US government, or either group as a whole; the target can be any individual or group however); also, an invented story meant to euphemistically gloss over and/or compliment an otherwise reprehensible individual or group.
4 (noun) an outrageous lie; a whopper
2) (noun) an invented story meant to viciously insult some person or group (in the traditional sense, usually a prominent Israeli Jew or American politician, or the Israeli or US government, or either group as a whole; the target can be any individual or group however); also, an invented story meant to euphemistically gloss over and/or compliment an otherwise reprehensible individual or group.
4 (noun) an outrageous lie; a whopper
(verb) Sharon didn't take her breakup very well; she's been chomskying her ex-boyfriend all over town.
(noun) That guy is an incredible bigot - whenever he's at some public gathering he can't help telling a chomsky or some anti-Semitic joke.
(noun) That guy is an incredible bigot - whenever he's at some public gathering he can't help telling a chomsky or some anti-Semitic joke.
by DrCruel September 8, 2006
Get the chomsky mug.Lots of wacky colored hairdos and strange odors from the crowd until the cops started pinkwashing them.
by DrCruel October 30, 2023
Get the Pinkwashing mug.A popular American fast food restaurant with a worldwide appeal and presence. Hated by college Marxists because it represents the triumph of capitalism and consumer choice.
by DrCruel December 30, 2005
Get the McDonald's mug.He tried to infiltrate our guild and abused us on the forums when he failed, so the guild leader put him on our HHAD list.
by DrCruel August 8, 2007
Get the HHAD mug.The Bolshevik head of the Red Army during the Russian Civil War and a subsequent attempted invasion of Europe in 1920, he is frequently idolized by Left fascist ideologues. Was a radical compared to Josef Stalin - the major issue between them during the 1930's was whether to make a second attempt at conquering Europe (Leon Trotsky wanted to attack them sometime during the 1930s, whereas Stalin advocated "socialism in one country" and wanted to build up the industrial power of Russia first before attempting any new conquests). Trotsky tried to use his leverage in the Red Army to have Stalin ousted and killed, but Stalin struck first, slaughtering Trotskyite loyalists in the Soviet armed forces during the "Great Purge" and eventually having Trotsky himself killed.
An altogether nasty, murderous man. His role is similar in Marxist mythology to that of Nathan Bedford Forrest amongst advocates of "The Lost Cause" in the American South - a romanticised figure that, in life, engaged in horrific atrocities and stood for the worst sorts of totalitarian barbarism. He is an especially appealing figure to those who still try to pretend that the Left is interested in anything resembling social justice, civil rights, etc. or that purport that the ideological mumbo-jumbo that Marxists repeat like magical formulas has any resemblence to the rigours of science.
An altogether nasty, murderous man. His role is similar in Marxist mythology to that of Nathan Bedford Forrest amongst advocates of "The Lost Cause" in the American South - a romanticised figure that, in life, engaged in horrific atrocities and stood for the worst sorts of totalitarian barbarism. He is an especially appealing figure to those who still try to pretend that the Left is interested in anything resembling social justice, civil rights, etc. or that purport that the ideological mumbo-jumbo that Marxists repeat like magical formulas has any resemblence to the rigours of science.
"Stalin was the one what ruined the Revolution - if only Trotsky had won his struggle for power everything in Russia would have been peaches and cream..." so on.
by DrCruel November 23, 2006
Get the Trotsky mug.Acronym that literally translates to "gay fag n00b"; in practice, refers to a player in a video game lacking even the most rudimentary skills, and implies an inability of said player to ever gain them.
by DrCruel December 25, 2007
Get the GFN mug.