Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor homepage. "Rule 3. Publish opinions. Don't reject an entry just because it's opinionated. Opinions are useful to readers unfamiliar with a topic. Don't reject an entry because you disagree or are offended. Don't reject an entry because you think it's inaccurate." It is not sexist as it is a view which can be held by any gender, does not generalise entire groups and does not mention any approval or promotion of discrimination. "Rule 2 Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it." So act with a little integrity, for once.
90% are useless, worthless cumdumpsters who vote up and post their feminazi opinions. when they're not doing that they're probably whining their used, rotten vaginas out that people are complaining about their retarded feminazi drivel whilst desperately trying to distance themselves from that fact. despite this they'll often either a) not vote down female chauvinism and only recognise sexism exists when (shock, horror!) it's directed at them (useless, worthless arsehole) or b) laugh at feminism and casual sexism and vote it up. c) the absolute rarity on urbandictionary: misogynist female who votes down chauvinistic, feminist stupidity and who doesn't expect people to simply accept casual chauvinism and irrational prejudice because some other oblivious, privileged arsehole who only empathises with their own interests (fuck you) finds it amusing.
A casual, inconvenient truth? Well, seems like that woman had her jimmies rustled.
Women are only useful for 4 things: Cooking, Cleaning, Vaginas, and their Sisters' Vaginas.