lexicali slim's definitions
1) idiomatic redundancy intended to emphasize what the speaker has just spoken while having the opposite effect by diminishing the relevance of their discourse by multiples of the numbler of times it is invoked.
2) verbal tic which indicates the speaker isn't listening to their own blather
3) nonsensical space filler; lesser variant of "uh" or "um"
4) verbal equivalent of checking one's nails
2) verbal tic which indicates the speaker isn't listening to their own blather
3) nonsensical space filler; lesser variant of "uh" or "um"
4) verbal equivalent of checking one's nails
i empowered my client by suggesting the pricepoint they argued would be impactful to the sale of their home. that said, oh- look, a garbage truck.
by lexicali slim September 26, 2009
Get the that saidmug. look at the message biff sent me, he must be intexicated:
meeet us at tttthe cl ub, we beee draN kin en stuuf
meeet us at tttthe cl ub, we beee draN kin en stuuf
by lexicali slim September 20, 2009
Get the intexicatedmug. 1)one who purports to a superiority which is manifestly unfounded; 2)one who takes umbrage at people who attend a school reunion not of their graduation year
get biff, talking about his all inclusive vacation, wearing a brown suit, driving a grand am gt, sporting a zircon, acting like the aly khan. he's such a classhole.
or;
biff wouldn't speak to me at the reunion because i didn't graduate with him. what a classhole.
or;
biff wouldn't speak to me at the reunion because i didn't graduate with him. what a classhole.
by lexicali slim September 15, 2009
Get the classholemug. dag, check that seemingly innocuous dude with the nasty mouth acting all fredandbarney love child. someone should bam bam on him
by lexicali slim September 26, 2009
Get the fredandbarney love childmug. by lexicali slim July 8, 2019
Get the Epstein-Barr Syndromemug. Non-grammarfluid refers to usage according to long-established grammatical norms with the simple aim of intelligible discourse. It is not a political statement. It does not deny the special personhood of special persons but does distinguish 'them' from 'they.'
A: My partner says we employ too many staff.
B: How many are they?
A: They are one. They are my partner.
B: I meant the staff. I'm sorry, I'm non-grammarfluid. My special personhood requires numerical specificity.
B: How many are they?
A: They are one. They are my partner.
B: I meant the staff. I'm sorry, I'm non-grammarfluid. My special personhood requires numerical specificity.
by lexicali slim October 15, 2020
Get the non-grammarfluidmug. by lexicali slim November 18, 2009
Get the sarahpalinmug.