flightfacilities's definitions
The paradigm that the limina has a 1-to-1 relationship with the Fauvic (internal) spaces of the Fauvic point.
In analytical meta-nihilism; the Fauvic-internal corners have a 1-to-1 relationship with the uncountable group of pseudorandom numbers.
Metafrequentism is a response to the question of whether an uncountable number of Fauvic corners have a 1-to-1 relationship with the perimeter of ONE pseudorandom number.
The answer is yes with respect to the pseudorandom prime; a liminal number.
Metafrequentism is a response to the question of whether an uncountable number of Fauvic corners have a 1-to-1 relationship with the perimeter of ONE pseudorandom number.
The answer is yes with respect to the pseudorandom prime; a liminal number.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the metafrequentism mug.The point of hyper-irony which contains an uncountable number of internal corners and an infinite number of avatars (trans-meta points) on its exterior.
The interior corners are actually transitional colors (of uncountable number) and the shine-points are hypercolors.
The Fauvic point is transparency in a point.
The interior corners are actually transitional colors (of uncountable number) and the shine-points are hypercolors.
The Fauvic point is transparency in a point.
The Fauvic point describes the seat of meta-nihilism.
It is an uncountable number of Fauvic corners surrounded by an infinite number of hypercolors which are infinitely orthogonal to the line-of-neonihilism national deficit-value of debt backed currency.
It is an uncountable number of Fauvic corners surrounded by an infinite number of hypercolors which are infinitely orthogonal to the line-of-neonihilism national deficit-value of debt backed currency.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Fauvic point mug.The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the kantian interpolation mug.A dialectic in which, over the course of a non-Tarski space, an uncountable set of points called 'Tarski-interior points' yield to an infinite set of points entering the mind non-Tarski space or transfinite-space via supersymmetry.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
Kantianism is a theory of free will in-the-mind.
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Kantian Dialectic mug.Kantianism is a theory that argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration always requires counting; but counting does not always require consideration...
Kantianism argues that free will exists because the uncountable set of points in the Tarski-interior count themselves.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Kantianism mug.Quantum field theory is a postulate that the most difficult "important" problem in mathematics--the Riemann Hypothesis--is the solution to the "hard incompleteness" problem in computer science.
In other words: the draw-distance that is equivalent to the surface area of a transfinite space is also equal to the surface area of a wavelet (complex number).
In other words: the draw-distance that is equivalent to the surface area of a transfinite space is also equal to the surface area of a wavelet (complex number).
The most difficult problem in computer science is the hard problem of indeterminacy (also called the hard problem of incompleteness).
The most 'complete' difficult problem in mathematics is the Riemann Hypothesis: the idea that the surface area of a transfinite space is equal to the draw-distance between two trans-finite spaces and that that draw-distance is equivalent to the surface area of the complex number or wavelet between the transfinite space and its adjacent transfinite space.
Quantum field theory speculates that equivalency equates to equality by hypothesizing that the draw-distance between two transfinite spaces being equivalent to the surface area of a wavelet ('half-moon') is a statement of equality between a polynomial-complete time-series and non-polynomial complete time-series.
In other words; equality is a statement of equivalency.
The most 'complete' difficult problem in mathematics is the Riemann Hypothesis: the idea that the surface area of a transfinite space is equal to the draw-distance between two trans-finite spaces and that that draw-distance is equivalent to the surface area of the complex number or wavelet between the transfinite space and its adjacent transfinite space.
Quantum field theory speculates that equivalency equates to equality by hypothesizing that the draw-distance between two transfinite spaces being equivalent to the surface area of a wavelet ('half-moon') is a statement of equality between a polynomial-complete time-series and non-polynomial complete time-series.
In other words; equality is a statement of equivalency.
by flightfacilities January 4, 2022
Get the quantum field theory mug.The indeterminacy problem in computer science is a statement that a polynomial time-wave is equal to a NON-polynomial time-wave under a hypothetical circumstance.
The problem of indeterminacy states that the draw-distance of a transfinite surface is equivalent to the surface area of a next-adjacent complex number.
A solution to the Riemann Hypothesis states that this is indeed the case.
A solution to the Riemann Hypothesis states that this is indeed the case.
by flightfacilities January 4, 2022
Get the problem of indeterminacy mug.